Fw: Time Is Like A River
4/23/2018 03:30:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, BARACK OBAMA, BLACK, Chris Christie, Christian Values are under Attack!!, CONSTITUTION, ENVIROMENTALISM, GAY, George Soros, government employees, Hollywood, LIBERAL MEDIA, U.S. Military, UNIONS | 4 Comments
FW: Another capitalist
A union boss walks into a bar next door to the factory and is about to order
a drink to celebrate Obama's victory when he sees a guy close by wearing a
Romney for President button and two beers in front of him. He doesn't have
to be an Einstein to know that this guy is a Republican.
So, he shouts over to the bartender so loudly that everyone can hear,
"Drinks for everyone in here, bartender, but not for the Republican."
Soon after the drinks have been handed out, the Republican gives him a big
smile, waves at him, then says, "Thank you!" in an equally loud voice. This
infuriates the union boss.
The union boss once again loudly orders drinks for everyone except the
Republican. As before, this does not seem to bother the Republican. He
continues to smile, and again yells, "Thank you!"
The union boss once again loudly orders drinks for everyone except the
Republican. As before, this does not seem to bother the Republican. He
continues to smile, and again yells, "Thank you!"
The union boss asks the bartender, "What the hell is the matter with that
Republican? I've ordered three rounds of drinks for everyone in the bar but
him, and all the silly ass does is smile and thanks me. Is he nuts?"
"Nope," replies the bartender. "He owns the place."
12/27/2017 03:30:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, BARACK OBAMA, MITT ROMNEY, REPUBLICANS, UNIONS | 1 Comments
FW: Republican Rioting
11/18/2016 03:30:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, 2016 Election, BARACK OBAMA, LIBERALS ARE BRINGING US DOWN, PROTEST | 8 Comments
Fwd: Obama Signs New Executive Order Expanding Homeland Security Mission In The U.S.
The purpose of this order is to maximize the Federal Government's ability to develop local partnerships in the United States to support homeland security priorities. Partnerships are collaborative working relationships in which the goals, structure, and roles and responsibilities of the relationships are mutually determined.There is established a White House Homeland Security Partnership Council (Council) to foster local partnerships -- between the Federal Government and the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and law enforcement -- to address homeland security challenges.Sec. 3. Mission and Function of the Council and Steering Committee(ii) promote homeland security priorities and opportunities for collaboration between Federal Government field offices and State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders;(iii) advise and confer with State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders and agencies interested in expanding or building local homeland security partnerships; - Whitehouse.gov
Executive Order — Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council
- President Obama signs Executive Order allowing for control over all US resources
- Obama signs Executive Order to accelerate green energy polices in industry
- Obama declares National Emergency and issues E.O. against Russian assets
- Purpose of the Fed's QE3 is to control of every mortgaged property in U.S.
- Television stations in Ohio and Arizona announce Obama victory before election
7/03/2014 03:30:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, BARACK OBAMA, HOMELAND SECURITY | 3 Comments
Fwd: : A toast to a very decent and good man.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:37 PM
Subject: Fwd: : A toast to a very decent and good man.
To:
Begin forwarded message:
This is a thank you note to a good man.I just hope Mitt Romney sees this….A wonderful tribute.Thank you !November 7, 2012
Thank you for turning aside from a life of ease and security to run for the presidency against an incumbent.Thank you for enduring the slander of you, your family, and your faith perpetrated by a criminally negligent media.Thank you for calling things such as 'terrorism' by their right name.Thank for selecting Paul Ryan as vice presidential running mate.Thank you -- and your lovely wife -- for demonstrating true love.Thank you for handling yourself with grace and equanimity in every situation.Thank you for your patriotism.Thank you for believing in America. It is to our eternal shame that America did not, in this time and place, believe in you.
5/12/2014 03:30:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, BARACK OBAMA, MITT ROMNEY | 6 Comments
Fw: very sad face--pls read-- A sad place for our country to be and the effe...
Rabbi Steven Pruzansky is the spiritual leader of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun in Teaneck, New Jersey
"The most charitable way of explaining the election results of 2012 is that Americans voted for the status quo - for the incumbent President and for a divided Congress. They must enjoy gridlock, partisanship, incompetence, economic stagnation and avoidance of responsibility. And fewer people voted.
But as we awake from the nightmare, it is important to eschew the facile explanations for the Romney defeat that will prevail among the chattering classes. Romney did not lose because of the effects of Hurricane Sandy that devastated this area, nor did he lose because he ran a poor campaign, nor did he lose because the Republicans could have chosen better candidates, nor did he lose because Obama benefited from a slight uptick in the economy due to the business cycle.
Romney lost because he didn't get enough votes to win.
That might seem obvious, but not for the obvious reasons. Romney lost because the conservative virtues - the traditional American virtues - of liberty, hard work, free enterprise, private initiative and aspirations to moral greatness - no longer inspire or animate a majority of the electorate.
The simplest reason why Romney lost was because it is impossible to compete against free stuff.
Every businessman knows this; that is why the "loss leader" or the giveaway is such a powerful marketing tool. Obama's America is one in which free stuff is given away: the adults among the 47,000,000 on food stamps clearly recognized for whom they should vote, and so they did, by the tens of millions; those who - courtesy of Obama - receive two full years of unemployment benefits (which, of course, both disincentivizes looking for work and also motivates people to work off the books while collecting their windfall) surely know for whom to vote. The lure of free stuff is
irresistible.
The defining moment of the whole campaign was the revelation of the secretly-recorded video in which Romney acknowledged the difficulty of winning an election in which "47% of the people" start off against him because they pay no taxes and just receive money - "free stuff" - from the government.
Almost half of the population has no skin in the game - they don't care about high taxes, promoting business, or creating jobs, nor do they care that the money for their free stuff is being borrowed from their children and from the Chinese.
They just want the free stuff that comes their way at someone else's expense. In the end, that 47% leaves very little margin for error for any Republican, and does not bode well for the future.
It is impossible to imagine a conservative candidate winning against such overwhelming odds. People do vote their pocketbooks. In essence, the people vote for a Congress who will not raise their taxes, and for a President who will give them free stuff, never mind who has to pay for it.
That engenders the second reason why Romney lost: the inescapable conclusion that the electorate is ignorant and uninformed. Indeed, it does not pay to be an informed voter, because most other voters - the clear majority - are
unintelligent and easily swayed by emotion and raw populism.
That is the indelicate way of saying that too many people vote with their hearts and not their heads. That is why Obama did not have to produce a second term agenda, or even defend his first-term record. He needed only to portray Mitt Romney as a rapacious capitalist who throws elderly women over a cliff, when he is not just snatching away their cancer medication, while starving the poor and cutting taxes for the rich.
During his 1956 presidential campaign, a woman called out to Adlai Stevenson: "Senator, you have the vote of every thinking person!"
Obama could get away with saying that "Romney wants the rich to play by a different set of rules" - without ever defining what those different rules were; with saying that the "rich should pay their fair share" - without ever defining what a "fair share" is; with saying that Romney wants the poor, elderly and sick to "fend for themselves" - without even acknowledging that all these government programs are going bankrupt, their current insolvency only papered over by deficit spending.
Similarly, Obama (or his surrogates) could hint to blacks that a Romney victory would lead them back into chains and proclaim to women that their abortions and birth control would be taken away. He could appeal to Hispanics that Romney would have them all arrested and shipped to Mexico and unabashedly state that he will not enforce the current immigration laws. He could espouse the furtherance of the incestuous relationship between governments and unions - in which politicians ply the unions with public money, in exchange for which the unions provide the politicians with votes, in exchange for which the politicians provide more money and the unions provide more votes, etc., even though the money is gone.
Obama also knows that the electorate has changed - that whites will soon be a minority in America (they're already a minority in California) and that the new immigrants to the US are primarily from the Third World and do not share the traditional American values that attracted immigrants in the 19th and 20th centuries. It is a different world, and a different America. Obama is part of that different America, knows it, and knows how to tap into it. That is why he won.
Obama also proved again that negative advertising works, invective sells, and harsh personal attacks succeed. That Romney never engaged in such diatribes points to his essential goodness as a person; his "negative ads" were simple facts, never personal abuse - facts about high unemployment, lower take-home pay, a loss of American power and prestige abroad, a lack of leadership, etc. As a politician, though, Romney failed because he did not embrace the devil's bargain of making unsustainable promises.
It turned out that it was not possible for Romney and Ryan - people of substance, depth and ideas - to compete with the shallow populism and platitudes of their opponents. Obama mastered the politics of envy - of class warfare - never reaching out to Americans as such but to individual groups, and cobbling together a winning majority from these minority groups.
The road to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and to a European-socialist economy - those very economies that are collapsing today in Europe - is paved.
For Jews, mostly assimilated anyway and staunch Democrats, the results demonstrate again that liberalism is their Torah. Almost 70% voted for a president widely perceived by Israelis and most committed Jews as hostile to Israel. They voted to secure Obama's future at America's expense and at Israel's expense - in effect, preferring Obama to Netanyahu by a wide
margin.
A dangerous time is ahead. Under present circumstances, it is inconceivable that the US will take any aggressive action against Iran and will more likely thwart any Israeli initiative. The US will preach the importance of negotiations up until the production of the first Iranian nuclear weapon - and then state that the world must learn to live with this new reality.
But this election should be a wake-up call to Jews. There is no permanent empire, nor is there an enduring haven for Jews anywhere in the exile. The American empire began to decline in 2007, and the deterioration has been exacerbated in the last five years. This election only hastens that decline. Society is permeated with sloth, greed, envy and materialistic excess. It has lost its moorings and its moral foundations. The takers outnumber the givers, and that will only increase in years to come.
The "Occupy" riots across this country in the last two years were mere dress rehearsals for what lies ahead - years of unrest sparked by the increasing discontent of the unsuccessful who want to seize the fruits and the bounty of the successful, and do not appreciate the slow pace of redistribution.
If this election proves one thing, it is that the Old America is gone. And, sad for the world, it is not coming back."
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.
1/09/2014 03:30:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, 2016 Election, BARACK OBAMA, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, MITT ROMNEY, NEW JERSEY, Occupy | 11 Comments
FW: Fw: Inheritance
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:08 PM
Subject: Fw: Inheritance
To:
Subject: Inheritance
Click on the attachment. |
10/11/2013 03:30:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE W. BUSH | 6 Comments
Fw: Fwd: For Your Information!
> : Fw: For Your Information!
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:36:00 -0400
>
> Subject: For Your Information!
>
>
>
>
>
> * In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia
> region, Obama received 100% of the votes
> with not even a single vote recorded for Romney.
> (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).
>
> * In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama
> received 100% of the votes where GOP
> inspectors were illegally removed from their
> polling locations - and not one single vote
> was recorded for Romney.
> (Another statistical impossibility).
>
> * In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a
> county with only 98,213 eligible voters.
>
> * In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574
> registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes
> were cast.
>
> * The National SEAL Museum, a polling location
> in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.
>
> * Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.
>
> * In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the
> total number of eligible voters.
>
> NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not
> require a Photo ID and lost in every state that
> did require a Photo ID in order to vote.
> Imagine that!
>
> ARE WE THE DUMBEST NATION ON
> THE PLANET OR WHAT ??
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
7/31/2013 08:09:00 AM | Key Words: 2012, BARACK OBAMA | 6 Comments



