Fw: Napolitano Meets with Muslim Brotherhood Leaders:- I am leaving the Demo

This is serious!

We are being setup for a major attack in this country. Airport scanners are to protect us from terror attacks. These attacks were made by Muslims and yet they will be exempt from using them. What are they really up to? Please read!


Transformed by faith: transforming through service
CJ Warren

Napolitano Meets with Muslim Brotherhood Leaders:- I am leaving the Democratic Party.

You may want to just skim first two memos. Scroll down to the article. This is important info. regarding the safety of all Americans and we must be aware.


Begin forwarded message:

I officially change my opinion. There appears to be virtually no true understanding of, or worse, an alignment of purpose with Islamist totalitarian political terrorists, from within the Executive branch of our government regarding domestic terrorism, the appeasement towards Islamist ideology, and support of the Brotherhood.

What should be apparent to any 6th grader who has done their homework in studying the Brotherhood in America, and what America stands for, seems to elude the sensibilities of our current (and previous) administrations. Our president may not be a practicing Muslim, but he is definitely an Islamist Collaborator because he is supporting highest level deliberations with an affiliate of Hamas, in violation of Executive order 12947 making it illegal to affiliate or support Hamas.

I do not agree with the viewpoint that there is a real distinction between meeting with the Brotherhood to find some areas of agreement, which I can not fathom knowing what that agreement might be, and being in violation of a law that says ANY support for Hamas is forbidden. The Brotherhood created Hamas! There is no middle ground!

I have kept out of politics as much as possible, but no longer. Napolitano must go, and the President, after this mornings signing of an Executive Order which appears absolutely senseless to me, has shown himself to be beyond even my liberalish ( California talk) "give him another chance to do the right thing" attitude. My wife has been a registered Democrat since coming to America from the former Soviet Union . My entire family have been registered Democrats since at least the end of WWII. I am now disassociating myself with the Democratic party which has disenfranchised me and my vote here in California . My wife has now chosen to register as a Republican, and I, being thoroughly disgusted with both major parties have not yet selected between being an Independent and registering as a member of McCain's party, which also doesn't thrill me.

What is now clear to me is that our government is not committed to containing the spread of sharia anywhere. In fact, they support it by condoning and engaging in sharia-compliant financing. Their commitments can be seen by their actions in the Middle East , and in their actions in engaging into discussions to develop working relationships with several supporters of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

I am emotionally torn by this decision to condemn our President as being an Islamist Collaborator. I, like virtually all of the people in my network, love America beyond words, and although we have many varied opinions, few of us would really wish the destruction of our current political system. I now stand for the destruction of the two party political system that has nearly destroyed America , and I don't think the cure is a third party. I think we need a fundamental change, and "Hope" has little to do with it.

This Progressive governmental insanity must end!

Mark Hass

Director, EducateUSA

Chapter Leader, Silicon Valley ACT! for America

Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil. Thomas Mann


Napolitano Meets with Muslim Brotherhood Leaders

As part of a new "counter-radicalization" program, the Homeland Security secretary quietly met with individuals tied to the outlawed terror group.

February 17, 2010 - by Richard Pollock

Last month, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and her senior staff privately met in Washington , D.C. , with a select group of Muslim, Arab, and Sikh organizations. Among the mix were three organizations directly associated with an outlawed terrorist entity — the Muslim Brotherhood.

Secretary Napolitano spent an hour and a half briefing them on Department of Homeland Security (DHS) counter-radicalization and anti-terrorist programs. The intensive briefings spanned two days (January 27 and 28) and were called by the DHS.

Although there is no evidence of an exchange of classified information, this meeting was the beginning of an Obama administration program aimed at devising a new information-sharing framework with the Muslim organizations — some of them regarded as extremist because of their ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The group is to meet regularly with DHS senior aides and with Napolitano. This program was imported from the United Kingdom . The Obama administration has decided to replicate the UK program to win over Muslims and to get them to collaborate with the federal government.

Although Matthew Chandler, deputy press secretary and spokesman for Secretary Napolitano, refused to comment on the meetings or identify the groups that attended the two-day session, Pajamas Media has learned the identities of a number of the participants and interviewed them — including those linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

The program requires bringing in Muslim groups as “partners” in a two-way information sharing program.

Walid Phares, director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, criticized the partnership concept:

“Through the so-called ‘partnership’ between the Jihadi-sympathizer networks and U.S. bureaucracies, the U.S. government is invaded by militant groups.” He warned that this policy embraced by the Obama administration “is how American national security policy has been influenced” by Muslim groups, who are duping administration officials.

A former U.S. intelligence officer told PJM:

The “counter-radicalization” program is something that the other side created for us. … It initially started in Britain . The Muslim Brotherhood groups suggested it. We went over there and got it. We thought it was a great idea and now we’re using it. It’s the enemy giving us a way to destroy ourselves.

The Muslim Brotherhood is the ideological foundation for today’s terrorist organizations in the Islamic world. Founded in 1928, it is the oldest Islamic fundamentalist political group in modern times. Originally called the Society of the Muslim Brothers, today it is a hardcore supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah and considered the inspirational “father” of al-Qaeda itself.

In 1981, Islamic radicals connected with the Muslim Brotherhood assassinated Egyptian President Anwar Sadat after he signed a peace treaty with Israel . Just this month, Egyptian authorities arrested 13 members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Since the early 1990s the Muslim Brotherhood has created a network of Muslim-American front groups that operate as “moderate” in the United States . At least three of the groups that met with Secretary Napolitano have been identified by intelligence officials and congressional sources as those that have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

One of the groups meeting with Secretary Napolitano was the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which was created by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. ISNA was named in 2007 by the U.S. Department of Justice as an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terror trial. The group was identified as a major financier of overseas Islamic terrorist organizations, particularly Hamas.

Ingrid Mattson, ISNA’s president, attended the Napolitano meeting. Mattson has been described by the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) as a Muslim leader who “has an established pattern of minimizing the nature of extremist forms of Islam and rationalizing the actions of Islamist terrorist movements.”

Another Muslim leader from the meeting was Salam al-Marayati, the executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). MPAC has a long history of defending terrorist acts. Al-Marayati repeatedly defended the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, the Muslim “charity” which was convicted of nine federal criminal counts and in 2001 was identified by the U.S. Treasury Department as a “Specially Designated Terrorist.”

In a 1999 PBS interview, al-Marayati called Hezbollah attacks on Israel “legitimate resistance.”

The Muslim American Society, another participant in the DHS meeting, was founded in 1993 by Jamal Badawi, an Egyptian-born Muslim Brotherhood leader. The organization was founded in Chicago as an American chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood with the goal of introducing sharia law into Muslim-American communities in the United States .

Muslim Advocates, a Muslim civil rights organization, also attended the meeting. Although not connected with extremists, a current video on its website castigates current law enforcement measures to crack down on home-grown domestic terrorists. Encouraging its viewers to resist, the Muslim Advocates narrator says American “policing strategies have changed. Increasingly, law enforcement is casting a wide net reaching innocent people who have nothing to do with terrorism.”

Reaction to the Napolitano meeting with the radical organizations was largely negative. Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC), a member of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, told Pajamas Media that while she applauded the administration’s effort to address domestic radicalization, she was “appalled” at the meeting with the radicals:

It is clear government agencies and officials do not get it. … [The meeting] is a dangerous policy and weakens our national security.

A former intelligence officer for the U.S. government told Pajamas Media:

The fact that the government reaches out to these groups, more than any other factor shows you how broken our intelligence apparatus is.

Steve Emerson, an internationally regarded anti-terrorism expert and the founder of the Investigative Project on Terrorism, said:

[The meetings displayed] a fundamental naïveté and glaring lack of critical knowledge about the source of jihadism in the world today, which is the Muslim Brotherhood. … I’m not sure she understands what the Muslim Brotherhood is. It’s the parent of al-Qaeda and all terrorist groups, and confirmed by all the intelligence chiefs.

Some of these groups DHS is involving in their meetings are presenting themselves as moderates, when in fact they are radical Islamists whose actions are part of the problem, and who will never be part of the solution. It is clear government agencies and officials do not get it.

The Napolitano meeting is not the only Obama administration effort to invite extremists into government programs. Last month, thirteen U.S. House members wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates expressing outrage that Louay Safi, a top ISNA official, had been invited to deliver lectures on Islam to U.S. troops stationed at Fort Hood after the November 5 killing of 13 and wounding of 30 by a radicalized Muslim-American.

According to the congressional letter to Gates, Safi was connected to the “Safa Group,” which they alleged was “moving large sums of money to terrorist fronts.” Safi also was caught on a 1995 FBI wiretap with Sami Al-Arian, who in April 2006 pled guilty to a charge of conspiring to provide services to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

In the past, Democrats have invited Muslim-American radicals to join U.S. anti-terrorism programs. After a public backlash, former House Democratic Leader Rep. Dick Gephardt in 1999 was forced to withdraw the nomination of MPAC’s al-Marayati to serve on the National Commission on Terrorism.

Knowledge of the Napolitano meeting may complicate her relationship with Capitol Hill. Her meeting with the Arab groups occurred the day after the secretary had failed to appear at a scheduled January 27 congressional hearing by the House Committee on Homeland Security. Although she has privately met with House leaders to patch up her relationship, some congressional members continue to call for her resignation.

Richard Pollock is the Washington, D.C., editor for Pajamas Media and the Washington bureau chief of PJTV

"Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it, have never known it again."

--- Ronald Reagan


Anonymous said...

I imagine the author carefully pieced this e-mail together from weeks of newspaper clippings, carefully arranged on his wall with bits of string between the conspiracy links.

gruaud said...

"Although there is no evidence of an exchange of
classified information..."

'The fact that no classified information was
exchanged just proves my theory!!'

Ok, so imprisoning Muslims without hope of a
trial is good, racially profiling them is great, and
torturing and killing them is just grand.

But talking to them is BAD.

Thus, we must destroy the American government
from within.

That about sum it up?

Anonymous said...

The nerve of Democrats, talking to people who are sort of our enemies in order to try and make them not our enemies!

Everyone knows the proper way to deal with people like that is to lie to secretly and illegally sell them weapons, use the profits to give to other bad people and then lie your ass off to Congress if you ever get found out.

Creeping Sharia said...

that's just the tip of the iceberg...

infiltration is taking place at all levels - local, state, and nationally

they are filling internships and jobs on the Hill as well

creeping bullshit said...

oh my god muslims in government jobs! what's next are they gonna let women vote? damn this free society, I wish we could force everyone to be christians, that would solve all the problems of the world.

gruaud said...

Well, gee whiz, Creeping Sharia...
what do you suggest?

Deportation? Prison camps?
Random tasering? A pogrom?
Would you like a pogrom?

And what about our Irish problem?

Do you really believe that Muslims
in this country are really going
to somehow miraculously impose
Sharia Law on the rest of the
United States?

The trouble with conservatives
(at least our current wacky crop)
is that they have been conditioned
to have zero faith in any of our institutions.

This may explain their rampant
bedwetting over everything.

chlecc said...

Republicans are traitorous dogs who should be put in camps until The War Against Terror is ended.

ferschitz said...

Creeping sharia troll is AFRAID, ASKEEERED, I tell ya. Rush Limbaugh's job is done.

Republics rule by FEAR & more FEAR. It has been their m.o. since forever.

Good job, creeping sharia, for being a good little pavlov's dog and quaking in your boots at the random bullshit and bigoted nonsense flung at you daily.

Tootseye said...

I voted for Obama because I WANT to have a dialog with Muslim nations. It is the only way to find a solution to work together with them.

Making Muslims into bogus boogeymen will only increase the potential of having them hate us and possibly engage in more terrorism. Creating avenues for discussion and finding ways to relate to one another is a way to diffuse the tension and potentially enhance better relations with one another.

Republics, aka the party of War Inc, is only interested in divisiveness worldwide, so that they can make money from the military-industrial complex. They use racist, bigoted diatribes like this to encourage their brainwashed minions to support the drumbeats of war.

It's all about the super rich getting even wealthier at everyone's expense. I am also offended by shit like this. I have Muslim friends, and this is really ugly, stupid and serves no purpose.

Creeping sharia needs to GROW UP and behave more like a mensch (look it up) rather than like an aryan nation wannabe.

Creative Commons License
MyRightWingDad.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.