-----Inline Message Follows-----
Hard to believe this comes out after the election
Illinois, the cradle of Liberal Democrat corruption!!!Hello!! - Is anyone in Chicago, Illinois awake??????
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Chart: Michelle Obama's Salary
Below you'll find a helpful chart and timeline explaining Michelle Obama's ultra-critical position at the University of Chicago Hospital (UCH), a position coincidentally created just after her husband's election to the Senate... and dissolved just minutes after she resigned to move into the White House.
Sandwiched, of course, by Sen. Obama's $1M earmark to UCH.
IIn 2002, Michelle Obama was hired by the University of Chicago Hospital as its "Executive Director for Community Affairs" at a salary of approximately $116,000.
In January of 2005, Barack Obama was sworn in as a United States Senator.
In March of 2005, Michelle Obama was promoted to "Vice President for Community and External Affairs" and her salary bumped nearly $200,000 (from $121,910 to $316,962). This position was "newly created" for Mrs. Obama.
In February of 2006, Barack Obama requested a $1 million earmark for a new hospital pavilion at the University of Chicago.
Effective 9 January 2009, Michelle Obama resigned her position at UCH.
Effective 14 January 2009, Michelle Obama's VP position was eliminated, its functions absorbed into another executive's position. This prompted writer Don Rose to ask "[If] that work can be folded into another guy's, why was it separate in the first place?"
Excellent question. Some roguish wags might speculate that a quid pro quo arrangement was in effect; pay-to-play as it were. But that seems highly unlikely given Barack Obama's high ethical standards *.
* Ignoring, of course, Auchi, Ayers, Blagojevich, Jarrett, Jones, Rezko, etc.
Posts
2 comments:
From the main link cited above: "In 2007, Obama switched from full-time to part-time, and subsequently took an unpaid leave of absence to work on husband Barack's presidential campaign."
So the hospital gave her the raise a year BEFORE any earmark was even asked for, let alone delivered, and a little over a year after the raise, she took an unpaid leave of absence from this job whose salary was an implied quid pro quo (or "quo pro quid," since the "payoff" appears to have occurred in a uniquely reverse order). She really knew how to milk that easy money.
Post a Comment