| date: | Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:58 PM | ||
| subject: | Fwd: Clear Explanation |
Subject: Fw: Clear Explanation
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were walking down the street when they came
to a homeless person. Trump gave the homeless person his business card and
told him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20 out of his pocket
and gave it to the homeless person.
Hillary was very impressed, so when they came to another homeless person,
she decided to help. She walked over to the homeless person and gave him
directions to the welfare office. She then reached into Trump's pocket and
got out $20. She kept $15 for her administrative fees and gave the homeless
person $5.00.
Now, do you understand the difference between a Conservative
and a Liberal progressive.
Posts
13 comments:
Yeah, conservatives suck. That's a huge, glaring difference.
You expect the poor to sit around in poverty depending on the whims of billionaires. Taxes are not theft. Crony capitalism IS theft, and on an unprecedented scale. If everything is privatized, that is theft from the public sector. Privatization is driven by one thing: profits. The public sector benefits all of us, and doesn't need to profit to function.
You remember the good old days? When paying taxes ment you were being patriotic and contributing to your country? After all having the world's largest army doesn't pay for itself. Conservatives don't.
Republicans hate government.
One of my Senators is a government-hating Republican. He's been in office since January, 1977.
In 2012, he spent $10 million to keep his job that pays $174,000 per year.
If government sucks so much, why has he spent nearly 40 years in its employ? Why is he willing to spend so much money to make sure he can continue to work for it?
A column on the anti-government ideology of Charles Kraphammer.
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/02/08/rightists-sell-anti-government-message/
The difference between so-called "conservatives" and alleged "liberals" is clear:
Conservatives want someone else to pay for everything, not them. But they get to take advantage of it for FREE.
In this parable, Hillary was extracting rent from Donald to help fund the system. Donald just wanted to pick and choose the people that he'd deign to help.
Yeah, that makes heaps of sense. Sit and around expect billionaires to cough up to fund the system, but don't ask me to pay taxes. But hey - gimme free land because I'm white and I call myself a "Christian" and I carry a lot of guns around to prove how manly I am!!
Hey ferschitz....I really don't have a hard time with what SHRILLARY did in this particular "clear explanation" little story. After all, Donald Trump is a blow hard "PUSSY"!!!! ha ha ha
But, what I do have problems with is SHRILLARY supporting the Keystone Pipeline, opposing the Carbon Tax, supporting NAFTA, praising the repeal of Glass-Steagall, voting yes for war in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, supporting the Patriot Act, and condemning that fokin' traitor Snowden!!!!!!!!
Yes sir fershcitz...despite all of this, you liberal weenies are gonna vote for that fokin' BITCH!!!!
Mike Hawk
You don't have a problem with any of that, because you are an intellectually dishonest piece of shit.
Fuck off, asshole hypocrite liberal weenie!!! Oh yea!!!
Mike Hawk
It's true Mike. You lie about everything and stand for nothing -- that's what a hypocrite is, Mike. You flip-flop like Romney, lie constantly, and steal other people's intellectual property. You are crude and repeatedly demonstrate a below-average IQ, even when you're not trying to be a clown.
Someone's an asshole here, and it's you, amigo. The sad thing is you probably think you're a 'good guy' in 'real life'. Nope. You are a 100% grade A jackass.
So you troll.
Oh yea.
I think almost everyone here has said they're not big Clinton fans for many of the reasons that "Hawk" lists. In fact, "Hawk" has pretty much plagiarized our lists (bc not able to think independently). Yet he continues to LIE - no big surprise, as that seems to be the default for conservative voters anymore - and say that commenters here are somehow huge Clinton fans and are going to vote for her.
It's tedious. It's boring. Adds nothing to the conversation. Guess this thing gets rocks off on yelling for no reason. And then sometimes picks fights with himself. weird. Best to ignore, frankly.
@Mike Hawk
Yes sir fershcitz...despite all of this, you liberal weenies are gonna vote for that fokin' BITCH!!!!
I'm indifferent about her, as are most people I know....who aren't Republicans. My Republican acquaintances, like you, seem to have an odd preoccupation with her.
If she's the nominee, I likely won't vote for her, but I don't have to make a decision anytime soon. Of course, I live in a deep red state, so it really doesn't matter whether I vote for her or not, or whether I even vote at all. The Republican nominee will win here, regardless of who it might turn out to be.
We don't know yet who will win the nominations for the two parties. It's just pleasant to have someone shouting ugly names at us for our pre-supposed votes.
Kind of like how many "Christians" are mean and ugly and shouty at people they presume not to be "Christians" or at least "Christian" in the way they happen to decide to define it (the Bible notwithstanding).
Really doesn't make you want to listen to them, feel like there's anything to learn from them, much less join them at their "church" or what passes for their political rallies.
CharlieE - So now you're leaning towards Bernie da' Jew Boy?
Wow
Mike Hawk - aka: Mr. Hawk
Post a Comment