MyRightWingDad.net

Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 10:36 AM
To:
Subject: more guns: less cime

How many times over the last 20 years has more guns less crime been a suppressed subject of honest investigation? Joe Farah chronicles data from the newest accumulation being carefully avoided by the mainstream media. shirl
==============================================



BETWEEN THE LINES
Proof: More guns = less crime
Exclusive: Joseph Farah shares good-news data from D.C. subsequent to Heller case



Posted: January 16, 2010



There it was. Good news on New Year's Day on the front page of the Washington Post.
"Homicide totals in 2009 plummet in District, Prince George's," the headline read.
In a story that likely got lost amid the holiday revelry, the paper reported that the nation's capital in 2009 experienced its lowest number of homicides in 45 years. In case you can't do the math real quick, that previous year would be 1964.
And for those too young to remember, 1964 was pretty much the end of an era. It was before the riots, before the Vietnam War was seriously escalated to become a national dividing point, before the drug explosion.
So what happened in Washington, D.C., in 2009 that might account for such a dramatic decline in homicide deaths?
Hmmmmm. Let me see. Nothing comes to mind.
Oh, wait a minute! Wasn't 2009 the first full year following the overturning of Washington's gun ban by the Supreme Court in the Heller case?
Could that have something to do with it?

Will blue-helmeted U.N. personnel be knocking on your door demanding your firearms? Wayne LaPierre lays out the agenda to limit your rights in "The Global War on Your Guns"

Apparently the Washington Post newsroom didn't think so. It was not even mentioned in the New Year's Day story – not even as an afterthought. That should tell you something about the political culture and worldview in elite newsrooms of America's major metropolitan newspapers.
But think about it!
Once again, we have more real-life evidence of the theory so well articulated by John R. Lott in his breakthrough book, "More Guns, Less Crime."
Remember what was predicted by the naysayers following the Heller case?
They foresaw blood in the streets. They believed a sort of citywide Armageddon would ensue. They prophesied gloom and doom. In fact, even in his Supreme Court dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer argued the gun ban was necessary for public-safety reasons because "guns were 'responsible for 69 deaths in this country each day.'"
What Breyer didn't understand was that guns are not responsible for any deaths. People are. Bad guys are. Murderers are. And when those guys have a virtual monopoly on force, because law-abiding citizens can't bear arms, that's when blood flows in the streets.

For 20 years before the Heller decision, Washington was known alternately as the murder capital of the country and the "District of Criminals."

(Column continues below)

But something happened to make 2009 different. There was a significant drop in violent crime and property crime. The sharpest drop was in homicides – 25 percent. There was a 16 percent drop in sexual assaults and a 10 percent decrease in car thefts.
Can anyone point to another factor?
Was it Barack Obama's anointing presence? I don't think so.
It was Heller.
By the way, you probably also heard the news that 2009 was a banner year for gun sales nationwide. Americans, in fear Obama and the Democrat-dominated Congress would move quickly to limit their ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights, went out and got guns while they could.
These folks braved the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression to go out and buy firearms, which are not cheap. They also bought ammunition, which is getting more expensive all the time.

And guess what resulted?

Were more people killed by guns as the gun-control freaks always predict?

Nope.

Just the opposite.

According to the FBI's uniform crime report, law-enforcement agencies across the country experienced a decrease in violent crime for the first six months of 2009 from the same period the year earlier. Violent crime, which includes homicide, rape, robbery and aggravated assault, decreased by 4.4 percent. The complete annual report is not yet released.
But, mark my words, when it is out it will show violent crime down throughout America – because more people have guns.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 270.14.147/2628 - Release Date: 01/17/10 07:35:00

Subject: Fw: PRIZE PHOTO

Ah, turning the tables can be so sweet!!!

AN ACTUAL CRAIG'S LIST PERSONALS AD

To the Guy Who Tried to Mug Me in Downtown Savannah night before last.

Date: 2009-05-27, 1:43 a.m. E.S.T.

I was the guy wearing the blackBurberry jacket that you demanded that I hand over, shortly after you pulled the knife on me and my girlfriend, threatening our lives. You also asked for my girlfriend's purse and earrings. I can only hope that you somehow come across this rather important message.

First, I'd like to apologize for your embarrassment; I didn't expect you to actually crap in your pants when I drew my pistol after you took my jacket. The evening was not that cold, and I was wearing the jacket for a reason. My girlfriend had just bought me that Kimber Model 1911 .45 ACP pistol for my birthday, and we had picked up a shoulder holster for it that very evening. Obviously you agree that it is a very intimidating weapon when pointed at your head ... isn't it?!

I know it probably wasn't fun walking back to wherever you'd come from with that brown sludge in your pants. I'm sure it was even worse walking bare-footed since I made you leave your shoes, cell phone, and wallet with me. [That prevented you from calling or running to your buddies to come help mug us again].

After I called your mother or "Momma" as you had her listed in your cell, I explained the entire episode of what you'd done. Then I went and filled up my gas tank as well as those of four other people in the gas station, -- on your credit card. The guy with the big motor home took 150 gallons and was extremely grateful!

I gave your shoes to a homeless guy outside Vinnie Van Go Go's, along with all the cash in your wallet. [That made his day!]

I then threw your wallet into the big pink "pimp mobile" that was parked at the curb ... after I broke the windshield and side window and keyed the entire driver's side of the car.

Later, I called a bunch of phone sex numbers from your cell phone. Ma Bell just now shut down the line, although I only used the phone for a little over a day now, so what 's going on with that? Earlier, I managed to get in twothreatening phone calls to the DA's office and one to the FBI, while mentioning President Obama as my possible target.

The FBI guy seemed really intense and we had a nice long chat (I guess while he traced your number etc.).

In a way, perhaps I should apologize for not killing you ... but I feel this type of retribution is a far more appropriate punishment for your threatened crime. I wish you well as you try to sort through some of these rather immediate pressing issues, and can only hope that you have the opportunity to reflect upon, and perhaps reconsider, the career path you've chosen to pursue in life. Remember, next time you might not be so lucky.Have a good day!

Thoughtfully yours,

Alex

P.S. Remember this motto ... An armed society makes for a more civil society!

I probably don't have to ask you to forward this one.

Curator's note: This RW FWD: is an "updated" version of this entry already in the archive.



Subject: Ah, sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir. . ..


Ah, sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir. . ..
















Excuse me Mr. Obama, I mean President Obama, Sir. Um . . I know you're busy, and important and stuff. I mean, running the country is very important and -- ah -- I hate to bother you, Sir. I will only take a minute. Ok, Sir?

See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering, Sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.


Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time and says, boy, she wishes she had digs like this, you know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow! I saw something like that in a museum once. Oh, sorry Sir. I didn't mean to get off the track. So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way.

I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island Sir? No? I didn't think so... Well, listen, anyway, I can't seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be "Not released" or "Not available." I'm sure it's just an oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are I have them written down here somewhere -- oh wait.

I'll just read it to you. Could you please help me find these things, Sir?
1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- "Not available"
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- Not available
8. Your Illinois State Senate records -- Not available
9. Law practice client list -- Not released
10. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate -- Not released
11. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
12. Record of your baptism -- Not available
13. Why your wife, Michelle, can no longer practice law as an attorney? (Insurance Fraud?_
14. Why your wife has 22 assistants, when other First Ladies had one?
15. Why were you getting "foreign student aid" as a college student?
16. Which countries "passport" did you have when you visited Pakistan in 1981?

Oh and one more thing Mr. President, I can't seem to find any articles you published as editor of the Harvard Law Review, or as a Professor at the University of Chicago. Can you explain that to me, Sir?

Oh, but hey -- listen! I know you're busy! If this is too much for you right now -- I mean -- tell you what. I'll come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, you know? I mean, I know you're busy. I'll just let myself out. I'll be back tomorrow. And the day after. . ..

What's that Mr. President? Who wants to know these things? We the People of the United States of America ! You know, the ones that vote.


SEND THIS OUT TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS.....

I (WE) WANT TO KNOW.....

Two Radical Arab Terrorists boarded a flight out of London. One took a
window seat and the other sat next to him in the middle seat. Just
before takeoff, a U.S. Marine sat down in the aisle seat. After takeoff,
the Marine kicked his shoes off, wiggled his toes and was settling in
when the Arab in the window seat said, "I need to get up and get a coke"
"Don't get up," said the Marine, "I'm in the aisle seat, I'll get it for
you."

As soon as he left, one of the Arabs picked up the Marines shoe and spat
in it. When the Marine returned with the coke, the other Arab said,
"That looks good, I'd really like one, too." Again, the Marine
obligingly went to fetch it. While he was gone the other Arab picked up
the Marines other shoe and spat in it. When the Marine returned, they
all sat back and enjoyed the flight.

As the plane was landing, the Marine slipped his feet into his shoes and
knew immediately what had happened. He leaned over and asked his Arab
neighbors... "Why does it have to be this way? How long must this go on?
This fighting between our nations? This hatred? This animosity? This
spitting in shoes and pissing in cokes?"

THE FEW. THE PROUD. THE MARINES.
Ya gotta love em

>


If anyone can disprove this, let me know so I can apologize for forwarding it.



Interesting

Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there, but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me.

I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever! Nobody recalls him. I'm not exaggerating, I'm not kidding." Root adds that he was also, like Obama, "Class of '83 political science, pre-law" and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him. At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me.

No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, the macha who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him. Is that not strange?

It's very strange." Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.

NOTE: Root graduated as Valedictorian from his high school, Thornton-Donovan School, then
graduated from Columbia University in 1983 as a Political Science major (in the same class as President Barack Obama WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN IN).

With conditions as they are, this song is appropriate at this time.

You may have heard it before but here it is again.


They should play this non stop at All Airports!!!

Turn up the sound on your computer and click on the song link below.......


http://www.animatronics.org/strangers/strangers.htm

Obama Trifecta:


President Obama just completed the UNHOLY and ANTI-AMERICAN TRIFECTA:

Add to that the first President not to stay in Washington for Christmas for the last 20 years. Past Presidents did not leave Washington for Christmas vacation until after Christmas. This was done so that their staff (Secret Service, Air Force One Crew, Limousine transport, Presidential advancing logistics, etc.) could be with their families for Christmas.

Obama: America's Gift To Terrorists

Nancy Morgan
RightBias.com
January 4, 2009

This man of action then handed terrorists legitimacy, along with all the legal rights American citizens have fought and died for. Enemy combatants, for the first time in history, will be tried in civilian courts in New York. In the same neighborhood they demolished on 9/11. How cool is that, terrorists say.

Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com
She lives in South Carolina

Author Bio

Heads Up - Doomsday is near !!!!!!

US Weather Bureau Report

The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared... Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.

I’m sorry, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922 as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post.

See information below






Click the following to access the sent link:

WSJ.com - Opinion: Why the Health-Care Bills Are
Unconstitutional* This article will be available to
non-subscribers of the Online Journal for up to seven days after
it is e-mailed.





*This article can also be accessed if you copy and paste the
entire address below into your web browser.

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052748703278604574624021919432
770-lMyQjAxMTAwMDAwNDEwNDQyWj.

html




Why the Health-Care Bills Are Unconstitutional
If the government can mandate the purchase of insurance, it can do anything.


By ORRIN G. HATCH, J. KENNETH BLACKWELL AND KENNETH A. KLUKOWSKI

President Obama's health-care bill is now moving toward final passage. The
policy issues may be coming to an end, but the legal issues are certain to
continue because key provisions of this dangerous legislation are
unconstitutional. Legally speaking, this legislation creates a target-rich
environment. We will focus on three of its more glaring constitutional
defects.

First, the Constitution does not give Congress the power to require that
Americans purchase health insurance. Congress must be able to point to at
least one of its powers listed in the Constitution as the basis of any
legislation it passes. None of those powers justifies the individual
insurance mandate. Congress's powers to tax and spend do not apply because
the mandate neither taxes nor spends. The only other option is Congress's
power to regulate interstate commerce.

Congress has many times stretched this power to the breaking point,
exceeding even the expanded version of the commerce power established by
the Supreme Court since the Great Depression. It is one thing, however,
for Congress to regulate economic activity in which individuals choose to
engage; it is another to require that individuals engage in such activity.
That is not a difference in degree, but instead a difference in kind. It
is a line that Congress has never crossed and the courts have never
sanctioned.

In fact, the Supreme Court in United States v. Lopez (1995) rejected a
version of the commerce power so expansive that it would leave virtually
no activities by individuals that Congress could not regulate. By
requiring Americans to use their own money to purchase a particular good
or service, Congress would be doing exactly what the court said it could
not do.

Some have argued that Congress may pass any legislation that it believes
will serve the "general welfare." Those words appear in Article I of the
Constitution, but they do not create a free-floating power for Congress
simply to go forth and legislate well. Rather, the general welfare clause
identifies the purpose for which Congress may spend money. The individual
mandate tells Americans how they must spend the money Congress has not
taken from them and has nothing to do with congressional spending.

A second constitutional defect of the Reid bill passed in the Senate
involves the deals he cut to secure the votes of individual senators. Some
of those deals do involve spending programs because they waive certain
states' obligation to contribute to the Medicaid program. This selective
spending targeted at certain states runs afoul of the general welfare
clause. The welfare it serves is instead very specific and has been dubbed
"cash for cloture" because it secured the 60 votes the majority needed to
end debate and pass this legislation.

A third constitutional defect in this ObamaCare legislation is its command
that states establish such things as benefit exchanges, which will require
state legislation and regulations. This is not a condition for receiving
federal funds, which would still leave some kind of choice to the states.
No, this legislation requires states to establish these exchanges or says
that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will step in and do it for
them. It renders states little more than subdivisions of the federal
government.

This violates the letter, the spirit, and the interpretation of our
federal-state form of government. Some may have come to consider
federalism an archaic annoyance, perhaps an amusing topic for law-school
seminars but certainly not a substantive rule for structuring government.
But in New York v. United States (1992) and Printz v. United States
(1997), the Supreme Court struck down two laws on the grounds that the
Constitution forbids the federal government from commandeering any branch
of state government to administer a federal program. That is, by drafting
and by deliberate design, exactly what this legislation would do.

The federal government may exercise only the powers granted to it or
denied to the states. The states may do everything else. This is why, for
example, states may have authority to require individuals to purchase
health insurance but the federal government does not. It is also the
reason states may require that individuals purchase car insurance before
choosing to drive a car, but the federal government may not require all
individuals to purchase health insurance.

This hardly exhausts the list of constitutional problems with this
legislation, which would take the federal government into uncharted
political and legal territory. Analysts, scholars and litigators are just
beginning to examine the issues we have raised and other issues that may
well lead to future litigation.

America's founders intended the federal government to have limited powers
and that the states have an independent sovereign place in our system of
government. The Obama/Reid/Pelosi legislation to take control of the
American health-care system is the most sweeping and intrusive federal
program ever devised. If the federal government can do this, then it can
do anything, and the limits on government power that our liberty requires
will be more myth than reality.

Mr. Hatch, a Republican senator from Utah, is a former chairman of the
Senate Judiciary Committee. Mr. Blackwell is a senior fellow with the
Family Research Council and a professor at Liberty University School of
Law. Mr. Klukowski is a fellow and senior legal analyst with the American
Civil Rights Union.

?



In case you missed it, on a recent Glenn Beck Show, he had a graph that illustrated the percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is... a real life businesses, not a government job. Here are
the percentages presented by Glen Beck.

T. Roosevelt........ 38%
Taft......................40%
Wilson ................. 52%
Harding................49%
Coolidge.............. 48%
Hoover .................. 42%
F. Roosevelt......... 50%
Truman.................50%
Eisenhower.......... 57%
Kennedy.............. 30%
Johnson.................47%
Nixon................... 53%
Ford...................... 42%
Carter................... 32%
Reagan.................56%
GH Bush.............. 51%
Clinton ................. 39%
GW Bush............. 55%

And the winner of the Chicken Dinner is..............

Obama................. 8% !!!

Yep! Thats right! Only Eight Percent!!!..the least by far of the last 19
presidents!! And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how
to run their business? They know what's best for GM...Chrysler... Wall
Street... and you and me?

How can the president of a major nation and society...the one with the most
successful economic system in world history... stand and talk about business
when he's never worked for one?.. or about jobs when he has never really had
one??!

And neither has 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers.! They've spent
most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs....or as
"community organizers" ..when they should have been in an employment line.

MAY GOD HELP US THROUGH THIS TRIAL!!

Words of wisdom Author unknown.

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a

citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will

be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to

restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved

electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is

much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of

what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the

vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can

survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely

to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."

Subject: OBAMANATION



Obama Strikes Again"

"I wanted to give you all some disturbing
information on our wonderful president. I work with the
Catch-A-Dream Foundation which provides hunting and fishing
trips to children with life-threatening illnesses. This past
weekend we had our annual banquet / fundraiser event in
Starkville .

"As a part of our program, we had scheduled Sgt.
1st Class Greg Stube, a highly decorated U.S. Army Green
Beret and inspirational speaker who was severely injured
while deployed overseas and didn't have much of a chance for
survival to come. Greg is stationed at Ft. Bragg , NC and
received permission from his commanding officer to come
speak at our function.

Everything was on go until Obama made a policy
that NO U.S. SERVICEMAN CAN SPEAK AT ANY FAITH-BASED PUBLIC
EVENTS ANYMORE. Needless to say, Greg had to cancel his
speaking event with us. Didn't know if anyone else was aware
of this new policy. Wonder what kind of news we all will
receive next. You're just starting to see the Obamanation.

Your religion is on the list next. I don't know
about you, but this makes me furious. What a rotten thing
to do by the "commander-in-chief". And I'm afraid we ain't
seen nothin' yet.

Retired Vice Admiral Bob Scarborough, of
Arlington , Va.

---------- Forwarded message ----------





Sent: 12/31/2009 3:37:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
Subj: my dog








My dog

My dog sleeps about 20 hours a day. He has his food prepared for him.
He can eat whenever he wants, 24/7/365. His meals are provided at no cost
to him. He visits the Dr. once a year for his checkup, and again during the
year if any medical needs arise. For this He pays nothing, and nothing is
required of him. He lives in a nice neighborhood in a house that is much
larger than He needs, but He is not required to do any upkeep. If He
makes a mess, someone else cleans it up. He has his choice of luxurious
places to sleep. He receives these accommodations absolutely free. He
is living like a king, and has absolutely no expenses whatsoever. All of
his costs are picked up by others who go out and earn a living every day. I
was just thinking about all this, and suddenly it hit me like a brick in the
head, Holy S#!t, my dog is a democrat

I cannot confirm all of this article is accurate, but the following independent articles confirm parts of it.
http://www.ntpi.org/html/womensrights.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonie_Darwish



________________________________

Subject: The Joys Of Muslim Women

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year
old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the
marriage by 9. The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the
woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private
parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce. To prove
rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses. Often after a woman has
been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return
the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing)
to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at
will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an
hour (prostitute) at his discretion. The Shariah Muslim law controls
the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the West World (America) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah
Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and
complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our
sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying
Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly
to the Shariah law.

By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a
slave under Shariah Law, ripping the West in Two. Author and lecturer
Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah
law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two. She recently
authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global
Implications of Islamic Law.

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza
before immigrating toAmerica in 1978, when she was eight years old.
Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a
high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in
Gaza. When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad.
His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position
in Muslim society.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned
her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity
after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law - what it
is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries. For
the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on
the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed.
Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the
dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that
non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.

Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as
assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and
eventually in the world. While Westerners tend to think that all
religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two
systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims.
Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages
the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing
a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia
advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be
interpreted as criticism. It's hard to imagine, that in this day and
age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose
to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an
Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West,
such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance
over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow
an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt
and elsewhere.

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to
elect the President by themselves! Rest assured they will do so... You
can look at how they have taken over several towns in the
USA..Dearborn Mich. is one... and there are others...

I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this. It will
not be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on! It is too bad
that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept
Muslims as peaceful.. some may be but they have an army that is
willing to shed blood in the name of Islam.. the peaceful support the
warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their
religion.. While Americas getting rid of Christianity from all public
sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are
planning a great jihad on America ..

This is your chance to make a difference...! Pass it on to your email
list or at least those you think will listen..

LET ME SEE IF I GOT THIS RIGHT. . . .
IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD
LABOR.

IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.


IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.

IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM
AGAIN.

IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY
AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO
POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.

IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET

A JOB ,
A DRIVERS LICENSE,
SOCIAL SECURITY CARD ,
WELFARE,
FOOD STAMPS,
CREDIT CARDS,
SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,
FREE EDUCATION,
FREE HEALTH CARE ,
A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN YOUR LANGUAGE
THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY'S FLAG WHILE YOU PROTEST THAT YOU DON'T
GET ENOUGH RESPECT

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I HAD A FIRM GRASP ON THE SITUATION...

THIS IS HOW YOU FIX CONGRESS!!!!!
A friend sent this along to me. I can't think of a reason to disagree.

I am sending this to virtually everybody on my e-mail list and that includes conservatives, liberals, and everybody in between. Even though we disagree on a number of issues, I count all of you as friends. My friend and neighbor wants to promote a "Congressional Reform Act of 2009". It would contain eight provisions, all of which would probably be strongly endorsed by those who drafted the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
I know many of you will say, "this is impossible". Let me remind you, Congress has the lowest approval of any entity in Government, now is the time when Americans will join together to reform Congress - the entity that represents us.

We need to get a Senator to introduce this bill in the US Senate and a Representative to introduce a similar bill in the US House. These people will become American hero's..
Thanks,

A Fellow American

***********************************



Congressional Reform Act of 2010


1. Term Limits: 12 years only, one of the possible options below.

A. Two Six year Senate terms
B. Six Two year House terms
C. One Six year Senate term and three Two Year House terms

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.



2. No Tenure / No Pension:

A congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.



3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security:

All funds in the Congressional retirement fund moves to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, Congress participates with the American people.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, server your term(s), then go home and back to work.



4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan just as all Americans.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.



5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.




6. Congress looses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.




7. Congress must equally abide in all laws they impose on the American people.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.



8. All contracts with past and present congressmen are void effective 1/1/11.

The American people did not make this contract with congressmen, congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.





If you agree with the above, pass it on to all in your address list. If not, just delete.

Subject: Sweet Home, Alabama!

You may have heard....

Obama will be making no more public speeches in Alabama ....
He claims every time he gets up on stage to make a speech,
some damn Alabama cotton farmer starts bidding on him.

Message to you regarding health care.

TRULY REMARKABLE!

I think it's truly remarkable that the press can investigate and find every woman Tiger Woods has had an affair with over the last few years; with photos, text messages, recorded phone calls, etc. They know not only the cause of the family fight, but even know it was a wedge from his golf bag that she used to break out the windows in the Escalade. Not only that, they know which wedge she used.

This is the same press—or is it—that cannot locate Obama's birth certificate, any of his college papers, financial records, or transcripts, or what passport he used when he traveled to Pakistan when travel there was prohibited for U. S. citizens.

Truly remarkable!