Fw: Fwd: Fw: Fwd: FW: Clinton's charitable donations.

> To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:25 AM
> Subject: Fw: Fwd: FW: Clinton's charitable donations.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:50 AM
> Subject: Fw: Fwd: FW: Clinton's charitable donations.
>
>
> Pretty slick !!!!!
>
> mike
>
> Subject: Clinton's charitable donations.
>
>
>
> It was disclosed yesterday that the Clintons have raked in over $100
> million since leaving the White House with the fine china and bath towels.
> Fine. It's a free country. And the money came from idiots stupid enough
> to pay to listen to the pair speak and read their books. It didn't come
> from me or, to the best of our knowledge so far, taxpayers.
>
> But of that $100 million-plus, the Clintons are getting fawning praise
> from the mainstream media for giving about 10 percent of the haul to
> "charity." A worthy and commendable figure.
>
> But as with everything else Clintonian, you have to look beyond the
> obvious. As our friend Amanda Carpenter of TownHall.com
> ;
>
> reports this morning, the charity the Clintons gave most of that money to
> was...themselves!
>
> That's right. The Clinton tax returns show that $10,256,741 was donated
> to CFF, the Clinton Family Foundation.
>
> "On the 2005 forms and those from previous years, Bill Clinton was listed
> as CFF President, Hillary Clinton has the title of secretary/treasurer and
> daughter Chelsea Clinton was 'director,'" notes Carpenter. "The 2006 tax
> forms list Gloria Clinton as CFF CEO and Manager, Erlinda Valdez as
> secretary and Catherina Hillman as treasurer. Gloria Clinton was paid
> $252,500 according to the 2006 returns for her work that year."
>
> Of the $10 million-plus the Clintons gave to themselves, they only
> parceled out about $2.5 million to other charities. Then again, $80,000
> of that went to the Clinton Birthplace Foundation.
>
> So the Clintons gave money to themselves in order to give money to
> themselves? These people are beyond contemptible. All the more reason
> why it's so important to make sure these two weasels have zero chance of
> getting back into the White House in November.
>
>
>
>
>

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's almost as if they run a charity they support.

Is this person saying that people should not be free to do what they want with money they have earned? That sounds... socialist!

By the way, the Clinton Foundation is a fundraising group that gives grants to philanthropic causes. Donating to them does not mean the money ends up back in Bill and Hillary's pockets.

Anonymous said...

Again with the Clintons! Guess they must be getting bored with the juvenile antics of the birthers, deathers, screamers & other assorted loons, liars and nutjobs that populate what passes for repugnantards these days.

Brought to you by the same folks who sycophantically looked the other way when Sainted Nancita Raygun got all kinds of hand outs when she was in the white house. Much of it was against the law, but Repugnantards wet their pants in joy to watch the Sainted Rayguns get all sorts of hand outs from couture clothing designers, expensive china, etc. IAOKIYAR.

I certainly don't hear much about the Reagan's great charitable contributions, but I guess, accoring to this nasty screed, that contributing to charity is bad. Who knew?

 
Creative Commons License
MyRightWingDad.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.