FW: Election Analysis

One awful email after another from my Father-In-Law.

Here's one. There really is a Joseph Olson, and a Hamline (not Hemline) school of law in St. Paul. Olson sounds like an idiot himself -- When he first got this email long ago, he passed it on, which is how they started using him as the source.

Also, this one debunked in Snopes (which I don’t much like actually but that's another story…) -Paul

-------begin forward-------

Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the Presidential election:

Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million Republicans: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tylers definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nations population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years

If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.
If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.


Anonymous said...

""In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country."

Um, has he read those statistics that "blue" areas (cities, populous states) pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits, and that "red" areas (less populated rural zones) get more federal benefits than their taxes pay for?

And it has nothing to do with political leanings. Densely populated areas tend to be more efficient (tax-wise), have higher crime rates, and are more liberal. That's correlation, not causation.

Creative Commons License
MyRightWingDad.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.