1400 years of inbreeding have severely damaged the Muslim Gene Pool
Bryan Fischer-Focal Point
Bryan Fischer-Focal Point
A huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding, By Bryan Fischer
1400 years of inbreeding have severely damaged the Muslim Gene Pool
Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.
This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.
According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for 3% of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.
The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as "retarded," increases by an astonishing 400% among children of cousin marriages.
(Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300% more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
Sennels says that "the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world." He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. "A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies."
Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the "Peace Prize." According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10% of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).
In Denmark, Sennels' native country, Muslim children are grossly over-represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical
handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.
Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark's biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.
The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, "One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole."
Sennels concludes:
There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims.
Because Muslims' religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.Let's hope America wakes up before a blind naivete about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Judeo-Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.
6 comments:
Wikipedia sez that "Cousin marriage was legal in all the States before the Civil War." So either the Founders weren't so "Judeo-Christian" after all, or Fischer is full of shit. Also: "Only Austria, Hungary, and Spain banned cousin marriage throughout the 19th century, with dispensations being available from the government in the last two countries. England maintained a small but stable proportion of cousin marriages for centuries."
So I take it we're just going to ignore Muslim scholars' accomplishments in science and math during the Middle Ages, as well as preservation of Western knowledge that was lost or destroyed by the superior Judeo-Christian society?
Also, the first hit on Google for this "Nicolai Sennels" is a site called "Loon Watch." Surely that's someone worth listening to.
These are Nazi tactics (arguing a religion is genetically inferior).
According to Sennels, "One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole."
How does this have anything to do with in-breeding? What a worthless comment from a generally worthless article.
It's unclear to me whether Muslims, in general, have a higher rate of cousins marrying than other cultures/religions. This article does not cite to any reliable studies. Rather it quotes some rather inflamatory "statistics" which may or may not be correct.
In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300% more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
And so, what's your point? Perhaps non-westerners in Denmark don't know Danish very well, which leads to them not doing well on tests.
This "study" points out that there is inbreeding in the British Royal family, too. So, what's Sennels saying then? That America should prohibit the British Royals from getting US citizenship because it will be "better" for the USA to avoid the *taint* of their Royal inbreeding??
And then we get to the "money quote":
Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.
Yes, let me couch this all in fake "sincere concern," but the bottom line is: MOOOOZLINZ is SCARY!!!111!!! And they're comin' to GIT YA!!!111!!!
I think rednecks have a problem with inbreeding, too. Maybe they can extrapolate something from this bigoted screed to apply to themselves??
Consanguineous marriage ok?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CousinMarriageWorld.svg
Blue = ok
Red = not ok
Orange = special circumstances
So right off the bat, Sennels and Fischer are exposed as full of shit.
Is first cousin marriage problematic due to possible genetic disorders? Of course. Any genetics course will teach you that, even to fake psychologists like Sennels. But to use that data as a weapon against the 'other'? All Sennels and Fischer write about is how Muslims suck. That isn't science, and it isn't journalism.
First cousin marriage may not seem like too big a threat in our highly mobile, mostly non-tribal America. But since our elites intend to "fundamentally change" America, we should look to Muslim or tribal countries like Pakistan where 1st or 2nd cousin marriages are the norm, and the resulting rate of birth defects is horrific.
Or look at the inbreeding of European monarchies. A recent study of the Spanish Hapsburg family showed that 200 years of consanguineous marriages resulted in Charles II being as inbred as the offspring of a father/daughter union! The man was sterile, and mentally and physically disabled. And the study notes that most of the inter-marriage of the Hapsburg family was between rather distant cousins. Only one marriage was between 1st cousins, and two marriages were uncle/niece. But, over time, the results were still appalling.
Western countries have enough problems meeting our own healthcare costs. We should outlaw cousin marriage and screen all immigrants for inbreeding, and we should campaign against inbreeding both at home and abroad.
We should oppose cousin marriage not only on health and economic grounds, but on the grounds of diversity and gender equality. Cousin marriage is both a symptom and a cause of tribalism. In Muslim countries where fathers are paid a bride price for their daughters, there is a tendency not to want to enrich a rival clan with either womb or cash. So they keep both womb and cash within their own clan by means of cousin marriage. The result is the sub-human status of women as property, plus the evils of tribalism and Balkanization. We don't want that here.
Post a Comment