Fw: [Fwd: Comments From a Senator .]

Want to read a bit of insanity?  Actually, it is a lot of insanity.
 


Comments From a Senator

Sen. Tom Coburn is an MD (general practitioner) and Senator from Oklahoma. and recognized as 'the conscience' of the US Senate. He is well respected on both 'sides of the aisle' & probably one of the few senators to actually read these 'bail-out' bills. (Google him for his background.) 
  
This takes a couple of minutes. It's from his speech in the Senate and it should raise your blood pressure.  
---------------------------------------------------------------- 


"We are going in exactly the wrong direction. We ought to be standing on the principles that made this country great. There ought to be a review of every program in the Federal Government that is not effective, that is not efficient, that is wasteful or fraudulent, and we ought to get rid of it right now. We ought to say, you're gone, to be able to pay for a real stimulus plan that might, in fact, have some impact. 
  
I would be remiss if I didn't remind everybody that next week we are going to hear from the Obama administration wanting another $500 billion. Outside of this, they are going to want another $500 billion to handle the banking system. Still not fixing the real disease - the pneumonia - we are going to treat the fever or treat the cough, but we are not going to treat the real disease. 
  
Until we treat the real disease, this is pure waste. It is worse than pure waste. It is morally reprehensible, because it steals the future of the next two generations. 
  
I am going to wind up here and finish, but I wanted to spend some time to make sure the American people know what is in this bill. I think once they know what is in this bill, they would reject it out of hand. 
  
Let me read for my colleagues some of the things that are in this bill... 
  
The biggest earmark in history is in this bill. There is $2 billion in this bill to build a coal plant with zero emissions. That would be          great, maybe, if we had the technology, but the greatest brains in the world sitting at MIT say we don't have the technology yet to do that. Why would we build a $2 billion power plant we don't have the technology for that we know will come back and ask for another $2 billion and another $2 billion and another $2 billion when we could build a demonstration project that might cost $150 million or $200 million? There is nothing wrong with having coal-fired plants that don't produce pollution; I am not against that. Even the Washington Post said the technology isn't there. It is a boondoggle. Why would we do that? 
  
Tonight, we eliminated a $246 million payback for the large movie studios in Hollywood. 
  
We are going to spend 88 Million to study whether we ought to buy a new ice breaker for the Coast Guard. You know what. The Coast Guard needs a new ice breaker. Why do we need to spend $88 million? They have two ice breakers now that they could retrofit and fix and come up with equivalent to what they needed to and not spend the $1 billion they are going to come back and ask for, for another ice breaker, so why would we spend $88 million studying that? 
  
We are going to spend $448 million to build the Department of Homeland Security a new building. We have $1.3 trillion worth of empty buildings right now, and because it has been blocked in Congress we can't sell them, we can't raze them, we can't do anything, but we are going to spend money on a new building here in Washington . 
  
We are going to spend another $248 million for new furniture for that building; a quarter of a billion dollars for new furniture. What about the furniture the Department of Homeland Security has now? These are tough times. Should we be buying new furniture? How about using what we have? That is what a family would do. They would use what they have. They wouldn't go out and spend $248 million on furniture. 
  
How about buying $600 million worth of hybrid vehicles? Do you know what I would say? Right now times are tough; I would rather Americans have new cars than Federal employees have new cars. What is wrong with the cars we have? Dumping $600 million worth of used vehicles on the used vehicle market right now is one of the worst things we could do. Instead, we are going to spend $600 million buying new cars for Federal employees.. 
  
There is $400 million in here to prevent STDs .. I have a lot of experience with that. I have delivered 4,000 babies. We don't need to spend $400 million on STDs. What we need to do is properly educate about the infection rates and the effectiveness of methods of          prevention. That doesn't take a penny more. You can write that on one piece of paper and teach every kid in this country, but we don't need to spend $400 million on it. It is not a priority. 
  
How about $1.4 billion for rural waste disposal programs? That might even be somewhat stimulative.  New sewers. That might create jobs. 
  
How about $150 million for a Smithsonian museum? Tell me how that helps get us out of a recession. Tell me how that is a priority. Would the average American think that is a priority that we ought to be mortgaging our kids' future to spend another $150 million at the Smithsonian? 
  
How about $1 billion for the 2010 census? So everybody knows, the census is so poorly managed that the census this year is going to cost twice what it cost 10 years ago, and we wasted $800 million on a contract because it was no-bid that didn't perform. Nobody got fired, no competitive bidding, and we blew $800 million
  
We have $75 million for smoking cessation activities, which probably is a great idea, but we just passed a bill-the SCHIP bill - that we need to get 21 million more Americans smoking (and paying tobacco taxes) to be able to pay for that bill. That doesn't make sense. 
  
How about $200 million for public computer centers at community colleges? Since when is a community college in my State a recipient of Federal largesse? Is that our responsibility? I mean, did we talk with Dell and Hewlett-Packard and say, How do we make you all do better? Is there not a market force that could make that better? 
  
Will we actually buy on a true competitive bid? No, because there is nothing that requires competitive bidding in anything in this bill. There is nothing that requires it. It is one of the things President Obama said he was going to mandate the Federal Government, but          there is no competitive bidding in this bill at all. 
  
We have $10 million to inspect canals in urban areas. Well, that will put 10 or 15 people to work. Is that a priority for us right now? 
  
There is $6 billion to turn Federal buildings into green buildings. That is a priority, versus somebody getting a job outside of Washington, a job that actually produces something, that actually increases wealth? 
  
How about $500 million for State and local fire stations? Where do you find in the Constitution us paying for local fire stations within our (the federal government’s) realm of prerogatives? None of it is competitively bid - not a grant program. 
  
Next is $1.2 billion for youth activities. Who does that employ? What does that mean? 
  
How about $88 million for renovating the public health service building? You know, if we could sell half of the $1.3 trillion worth of properties we have, we could take care of every Federal building requirement and backlog we have. 
  
Then there's $412 million for CDC buildings and property. We spent billions on a new center and headquarters for CDC. Is that a priority? Building another Government building instead of - if we are going to spend $412 million on building buildings, let's build one that will produce something, one that will give us something. 
  
How about $850 million for that most "efficient'' Amtrak that hasn't made any money since 1976 and continues to receive $2 billion or $3 billion a year in subsidies? 
  
Here is one of my favorites: $75 million to construct a new "security training'' facility for State Department security officers.  We have four other facilities already available to train them. But it is not theirs. They want theirs. By the way, it is going to be in West Virginia ... I wonder how that got there? So we are going to build a new training facility that duplicates four others that we already have that could easily do what we need to do. But because we have a stimulus package, we are going to add in oink pork. 
  
How about $200 million in funding for a lease - not buying, but a lease of alternative energy vehicles on military installations? 
  
We are going to bail out the States on Medicaid. Total all of the health programs in this, and we are going to transfer $150 billion out of the private sector and we are going to move it to the Federal Government. You talk about back dooring national health care!  Henry Waxman has to be smiling big today. He wants a single-payer Government-run health care system. We are going to move another $150 billion to the Federal Government from the private sector. 
  
We are going to eliminate fees on loans from the Small Business Administration. You know what that does? That pushes productive capital to unproductive projects. It is exactly the wrong thing to do. 
  
Then there is $160 million to the Job Corps Program - But not for 20 jobs and not to put more people in the Job Corps but to construct or repair buildings. 
  
We are going to spend $524 million for information technology upgrades that the Appropriations Committee claims will create 388 jobs. If you do the math on that, that is $1.5 million a job. Don't you love the efficiency of Washington thinking? 
  
We are going to create $79 billion in additional money for the States, a "slush fund,'' to bail out States and provide millions of dollars for education costs. How many of you think that will ever go away? Once the State education programs get $79 billion over 2 years, do you think that will ever go away? The cry and hue of taking our money away - even though it was a stimulus and supposed to be limited, it will never go away. So we will continue putting that forward until our kids have grandkids of their own. 
  
There is about $47 billion for a variety of energy programs that are primarily focused on renewable energy. I am fine with spending that. But we ought to get something for it. There ought to be measurable results. There are none.  It is pie in the sky, saying we will throw some money at it. 
  
Let me conclude by saying we are at a seminal moment in our country. We will either start living within the confines of realism and responsibility or we will blow it and we will create the downfall of the greatest Nation that ever lived. This bill is the start of that downfall. To abandon a market-oriented society and transfer it to a Soviet-style, government-centered, bureaucratic-run and mandated program, that is the thing that will put the stake in the heart of freedom in this country. 
  
I hope the American people know what is in this bill. I am doing everything I can to make sure they know. But more important, I hope somebody is listening who will treat the pneumonia we are faced with today, which is the housing and mortgage markets. It doesn't matter how much money we spend in this bill. It is doomed to failure unless we fix that problem first. Failing that, we will go down in history as the Congress that undermined the future and vitality of this country. Let it not be so." 
  
PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO EVERYBODY YOU KNOW! THANKS!!!

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

"PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO EVERYBODY YOU KNOW! THANKS!!!"

Because presumably, they are just as ignorant and misinformed as you are, so this misleading, inaccurate, and lie-filled rant will be just as effective on them as it is on you!

Meanwhile, we'll keep on dumping billions of dollars into unwinnable wars, keep on making contractors rich, keep on encouraging giant corporations to offshore jobs, and keep on giving taxcuts to millionaires and billionaires! But you can just ignroe that part!

Thanks for being so gullible! Couldn't do it without ya!

Anonymous said...

What the hell is this babbling about? What bill? The Omnibus? What are they even talking about?

Somehow I doubt that Coburn ever said, or at least said it in this form. And a lot of this is crap. Add up every supposedly wasteful thing in this rant, and you might get the cost of one year in Iraq, or maybe the cost of those shiny new tax cuts for the top 1% which the Republicans just extorted at gunpoint.

Anonymous said...

Holy Crap, this is talking about the Stimlus bill. That was two fucking years ago, and it 1) gave you idiots a tax cut and 2) saved the economy from falling off a cliff. And they are STILL whining about it and getting their rocks off by forwarding this crap from a guy on the losing side of cutting their taxes? A guy who just last week took the US Senate hostage in order to secure a 4% tax break for his ultra rich masters?

Losers.

Valeyard said...

For an MD, he sure spends precious little time talking about medicine, which is the biggest and fastest-growing budget item the government and private citizens face.

In fact, his points on medicine are:
- More people should smoke so the taxes will pay for poor children's health care.
- The CDC doesn't "produce something, give us something" worth funding.
- Ensuring a family of four making less than $30,000 a year can get Medicaid is somehow stealing insurance money from private insurance.

For a doctor, Sen. Coburn is not very bright.

Marc with a C said...

Ah yes. Good ol' forced sterilization Coburn. Remember kids, this is the guy who said the airing of Schindler's List on network TV was "obscene" because it contained nudity. I also have my doubts that he said everything written here, but I'm always being surprised. But for a few choice nuggets of stupidity...

"We have $10 million to inspect canals in urban areas. Well, that will put 10 or 15 people to work. Is that a priority for us right now? "

Only if you care about the collapse of American infrastructure.

"How about $1.4 billion for rural waste disposal programs? That might even be somewhat stimulative. New sewers. That might create jobs."

Funny, that a few sentences later you berate "federal largesse" when it comes to supply computers for local schools.

"We don't need to spend $400 million on STDs. What we need to do is properly educate about the infection rates and the effectiveness of methods of prevention."

Which will be paid for by the happy rainbows and unicorn dust they have growing on Mt. Crazy.

Nightsky said...

"We don't need to spend $400 million on STDs. What we need to do is properly educate about the infection rates and the effectiveness of methods of prevention."

Good to know that Coburn is publicly renouncing abstinence-only education! His fellow theocrats will be delighted with him, I'm sure.

Anonymous said...

"We don't need to spend $400 million on STDs. What we need to do is properly educate about the infection rates and the effectiveness of methods of prevention."

Ya, pretty sure that's what the 400 million was for Dr. Obvious. You know, for training and education along those lines. As much as you would like to think that teachers and educational materials are free, they aren't.

gruaud said...

Tom Coburn and James Inhofe.

Oklahoma, what the hell is in your water supply?

katz said...

Those scare quotes at the beginning are right on the money. 'The conscience' of the US Senate, indeed.

And it's from his speech in the Senate. Way to cite your source!

ferschitz said...

Anyone who sends out emails quote Coburn as some sort of guru has shit for brains.

The end.

 
Creative Commons License
MyRightWingDad.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.