MyRightWingDad.net

(click on image)

Love your blog! Here's a good one, from a family member. -Steve

---------begin forward----------

*Please pass this on to everyone you know! These facts and questions
you need to ask yourself are, by far, much too important when it comes
to voting for your Presidential candidate. Besides, no one else dare
tell you these truths because they are factual.







Barack Obama's Resume & Other questions to ponder







POSITION



A Community Organizer through the Mayor's Office of Chicago.



Two years experience as a U.S. Senator, with not one accomplishment
that can be noted. How much time did he spend working on building his
presidential campaign vs. doing his job by reading bills and voting on
these bills as a Senator?



Giving great scripted speeches.



Writing a book about himself.







EDUCATION



Harvard Law School.





OTHER INTERESTING NOTATIONS



Barack Obama never speaks of his entire childhood; only what sounds
positive to our citizens regarding his childhood upbringing. Here's
what he doesn't say:

Born 1961.
He was an only child of a Muslim father and an atheist mother.
His father left them when he was two.
His mother met and married another Muslim, Lolo Soetoro, and moved
Barack to Jakarta, Indonesia where he lived until the age of 10.
Facts show the first six years of your life determines your basic
outlook and mindset in life.
He was then raised by his Grandparents in the USA.



On 200 bills voted on in the Senate from the moment he became a US
Senator; he did NOT vote "yes or no"; but only "present". What does
this tell you regarding his decision making?



During his campaign, He has changed his mind on so many issues
regarding the war, supporting Israel, etc. there's an inconclusive
decision on where he really stands regarding this topic. This mirrors
his lack of voting in the Senate.



I've heard Barack say talking things out with known terrorists will
work and peace will come from that tactic. *However, the golden rule
of all Islamic terrorists are; "Kill any and all 'Infidels' (that's
us) at all costs and if you die in the process, you will be rewarded
in heaven." All Islamic Terrorist groups are actively in "Jihad".
Jihad means "holy war."



o "The purpose of jihad, in other words, is not directly to
spread the Islamic faith but to extend sovereign Muslim power (faith,
of course, often follows the flag). Jihad is thus unabashedly
offensive in nature, with the eventual goal of achieving Muslim
dominion over the entire globe."…

o

o How do Muslims see Barack Hussein Obama? They have three
choices: either as he presents himself – someone who has "never been a
Muslim" and has "always been a Christian"; or as a fellow Muslim; or
as an apostate from Islam.

o Reports suggests that while Americans generally view the
Democratic candidate having had no religion before converting at
Reverend Jeremiah Wrights's hands at age 27, Muslims the world over
rarely see him as Christian but usually as either Muslim or ex-Muslim.

o Lee Smith of the Hudson Institute explains why: "Barack
Obama's father was Muslim and therefore, according to Islamic law, so
is the candidate. In spite of the Quranic verses explaining that there
is no compulsion in religion, a Muslim child takes the religion of his
or her father. … for Muslims around the world, non-American Muslims at
any rate, they can only ever see Barack Hussein Obama as a Muslim." In
addition, his school record from Indonesia lists him as a Muslim

Article by Daniel Pipes

http://www.DanielPipes.org



Ask yourself; "What solutions does he give us when he speaks of all
these wonderful things he wants to do for us in his speeches."



The only way is to raise taxes on everyone. This will be worse for
the people of this nation by taking more money out of the common man's
pocket.



"More of the same" is his motto regarding John McCain. If you had
heard John McCain's speech, you would've known the honest truth.



Why didn't Barack Obama refuse any Town Hall Meetings between
candidates? Might he be afraid of the surprise questions our citizens
could potentially ask him? Or, is there another reason why he
wouldn't want to answer direct questions from US citizens?



Barack insisted on only debates when John McCain wanted our citizens
involved on one on one questions; no matter what a citizen wants to
ask. In debates, it's more likely the host would only ask general
questions that can be easily answered in such a way as to appease our
citizens with a false sense of security. Also, these questions can be
given to the candidates prior to the debate. US citizens are unable
to participate.



John McCain believes in protecting our country and standing up for
freedom in other free countries; does Barack Obama? I don't know this
answer since he doesn't tell us what he will do in this arena. I do
know he finds out what the majority wants and makes sure his rhetoric
in speeches lines up with the majority. And yet, his actions in
Congress doesn't solidify if we can believe him.



In conclusion: Please ask yourself these basic questions when you're
at the polling booth;



Why am I voting for Barack Obama? Is it because of his skin color?
Can skin color determine leadership abilities?



Do you really believe Terrorists care about peace within our nation?



Can you honestly say Barack has had enough experience to be our President?



Which candidate can you trust enough to keep us sleeping at night
because he believes in freedom for all?



Which candidate has solid experience to lead this country through the
quagmire of our present economic situation and lead us towards a more
peaceful and prosperous nation?



Do you believe Barack Obama has the firm believe in the United States
government's goals and sound belief system based on the Constitution?
Or, as a Muslim, will not try to change our government to move away
from our basic freedoms as citizens? (Good questions to contemplate
since he spent the primary years of his life learning the Muslim way.

> THIS IS SOMETHING WE BETTER PAY ATTENTION TO!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> You are aware, probably, that Barack Obama lost his bearings recently and said that he was going to campaign in all 57 states.
>
> You heard this? And everybody chalked it up to, 'Well, he's tired.'
>
> You know, this is a Dan Quayle moment. I mean, Dan Quayle goes out there and misspells 'potato,' and we still hear jokes about it.
>
> Barack Obama says he's gonna go out and campaign gn in 57 states, he was just tired, you know, it's been such a long campaign, he's been so many places, he probably thinks there are 57 states.
>
> Well, I have here a printout from a web site called the International Humanist and Ethical Union. And here is how the second paragraph of an article on that web site begins.
>
> 'Every year from 1999 to 2005 the organization of the Islamic conference representing the 57 Islamic states presented a resolution to the United Nations Commission on human rights.' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_of_the_Islamic_Conference)
> Obama said he's going to campaign in 57 states, and it turns out that there are 57 Islamic states.
>
> So did Obama just lose his bearings, or was this a more telling slip, ladies and gentlemen?
>
> KEEP IT GOING, FOLKS!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

A man died and went to heaven. As he stood in front of St. Peter at
the Pearly Gates, he saw a huge wall of clocks behind him.

He asked, 'What are all those clocks?'

St. Peter answered, 'Those are Lie-Clocks. Everyone on Earth has a
Lie-Clock.

Every time you lie the hands on your clock will move.'

'Oh,' said the man, 'whose clock is that?'

'That's Mother Teresa's. The hands have never moved, indicating
that she never told a lie.'

'Incredible,' said the man'. And whose clock is that one?'

St. Peter responded, 'That's Abraham Lincoln's clock. The hands
have moved twice, telling us that Abe told only two lies in his entire
life.'

'Where's Barack Obama's clock?' asked the man.

'Obama's clock is in Jesus' office.

He's using it as a ceiling fan.

"From my own right wing dad. This kind of misogynistic tripe is considered 'funny' by mainstream Republicans?" -Mike P

Okay, let's work this out logically without a lot of emotion.

---------begin forwarded message----------

Chicago Annenberg Challenge Shutdown?
A cover-up in the making?

By Stanley Kurtz

The problem of Barack Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers will not go away.
Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn were terrorists for the notorious
Weather Underground during the turbulent 1960s, turning fugitive when a bomb
— designed to kill army officers in New Jersey — accidentally exploded in a
New York townhouse. Prior to that, Ayers and his cohorts succeeded in
bombing the Pentagon. Ayers and Dohrn remain unrepentant for their terrorist
past. Ayers was pictured in a 2001 article for Chicago magazine, stomping on
an American flag, and told the New York Times just before 9/11 that the
notion of the United States as a just and fair and decent place “makes me
want to puke.” Although Obama actually launched his political career at an
event at Ayers’s and Dohrn’s home, Obama has dismissed Ayers as just “a guy
who lives in my neighborhood,” and “not somebody who I exchange ideas from
on a regular basis.” For his part, Ayers refuses to discuss his relationship
with Obama.


Although the press has been notably lax about pursuing the matter, the full
story of the Obama-Ayers relationship calls the truth of Obama’s account
seriously into question. When Obama made his first run for political office,
articles in both the Chicago Defender and the Hyde Park Herald featured
among his qualifications his position as chairman of the board of the
Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a foundation where Ayers was a founder and
guiding force. Obama assumed the Annenberg board chairmanship only months
before his first run for office, and almost certainly received the job at
the behest of Bill Ayers. During Obama’s time as Annenberg board chairman,
Ayers’s own education projects received substantial funding. Indeed, during
its first year, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge struggled with significant
concerns about possible conflicts of interest. With a writ to aid Chicago’s
public schools, the Annenberg challenge played a deeply political role in
Chicago’s education wars, and as Annenberg board chairman, Obama clearly
aligned himself with Ayers’s radical views on education issues. With Obama
heading up the board and Ayers heading up the other key operating body of
the Annenberg Challenge, the two would necessarily have had a close working
relationship for years (therefore “exchanging ideas on a regular basis”). So
when Ayers and Dorhn hosted that kickoff for the first Obama campaign, it
was not a random happenstance, but merely further evidence of a close and
ongoing political partnership. Of course, all of this clearly contradicts
Obama’s dismissal of the significance of his relationship with Ayers.

This much we know from the public record, but a large cache of documents
housed in the Richard J. Daley Library at the University of Illinois at
Chicago (UIC), is likely to flesh out the story. That document cache
contains the internal files of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. The records
in question are extensive, consisting of 132 boxes, containing 947 file
folders, a total of about 70 linear feet of material. Not only would these
files illuminate the working relationship between Obama and Bill Ayers, they
would also provide significant insight into a web of ties linking Obama to
various radical organizations, including Obama-approved foundation gifts to
political allies. Obama’s leadership style and abilities are also sure to be
illuminated by the documents in question.

COVER-UP?
Unfortunately, I don’t yet have access to the documents. The Special
Collections section of the Richard J. Daley Library agreed to let me read
them, but just before I boarded my flight to Chicago, the top library
officials mysteriously intervened to bar access. Circumstances strongly
suggest the likelihood that Bill Ayers himself may have played a pivotal
role in this denial. Ayers has long taught at UIC, where the Chicago
Annenberg Challenge offices were housed, rent-free. Ayers likely arranged
for the files of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge to be housed in the UIC
library, and may well have been consulted during my unsuccessful struggle to
gain access to the documents. Let me, then, explain in greater detail what
the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) records are, and how I have been
blocked from seeing them.

Initially, as I said, library officials said that I could examine the CAC
records. I received this permission both over the phone and in writing. The
subsequent denial of access came with a series of evolving explanations. Is
this a politically motivated cover-up? Although at this stage it is
impossible to know, it is hard to avoid the suspicion. I also have some
concerns for the security of the documents, although I have no specific
evidence that their security is endangered. In any case, given the relative
dearth of information about Barack Obama’s political past, there is a
powerful public interest in the swift release of these documents.

ACCESS APPROVED
When I learned that the CAC records were housed at UIC Library, I phoned and
was assured by a reference librarian that, although I have no UIC
affiliation, I would be permitted to examine the records. He suggested I
phone the Special Collections section of the library and set up an
appointment with a special collections librarian. This reference librarian
also ran a search for me and discovered that, in addition to the CAC
records, one file folder in the UIC Chancellor’s Office of Community
Relations archive contains information on CAC from 1995.

I then spoke with a special-collections librarian and was again assured that
I would have access to the CAC records. I was told that, while I could not
personally make copies of the material, I could identify documents of
interest and have copies made by the library, for a fee. I set up an
appointment to meet with the special-collections librarian, and she
suggested that I e-mail her the information on the CAC-related chancellor’s
documents the reference librarian had discovered, and confirm my appointment
time. After I did so, this special-collections librarian forwarded my
message to a graduate assistant.

The graduate assistant then e-mailed to let me know that, while the CAC
collection had been “processed,” the “finding aid” had not yet been put
online. (The “finding aid” is a detailed document of over 60 pages
specifying the topics covered by each of the 947 folders in the collection,
and showing which boxes hold which folders.) Because the finding aid was not
yet online, the graduate assistant attached a copy to her e-mail, inviting
me to browse it and identify documents of particular interest, so that the
library could have some of the CAC material out and ready for me immediately
upon my arrival. I wrote back indicating that I would like to see the single
CAC-related folder from the chancellor’s archive, and further identifying 14
boxes from the main body of CAC records containing folders of special
interest. Having received clear and repeated representations from the UIC
library staff that I would be granted access to the CAC records, I arranged
a trip to Chicago.

ACCESS DENIED
What follows is more detail than some readers may want to know, but it seems
important to get it on record. If a body of material potentially damaging to
Barack Obama is being improperly embargoed by a library, the details matter.



------ End of Forwarded Message

Obama: A-Rab Slave Owning AnitChrist ? This forward was sent in from Taylor and Michael. It's another favorite of mine. Enjoy.

"Another thought provoking essay from 'thinking' Americans." -Michael




---------- Forwarded message ----------


> From: $$$$$$@#######.com
> Subject: Fwd: FW: Jack Wheeler, on Obama !
> To: ******@###.com
> Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 3:50 PM
>

Subject: DR. JACK WHEELER on OBAMA


A heavy weight weighs in on Obama's qualifications for
president.

Click here to see a clip from the best movie of our time.

FORMS ARE GOING FAST- SIGN UP TODAY!

Becoming Illegal (Actual letter from an Iowa resident and sent to his senator)

The Honorable Tom Harkin
731 Hart Senate Office Building
Phone (202) 224 3254
Washington DC , 20510

Dear Senator Harkin,

As a native Iowan and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.

My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years. I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before everyone figures it out.

Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively? This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.

Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year.

Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as 'in-state' tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.

Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.

If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative. Thank you for your assistance.

Your Loyal Constituent ,
Donald Ruppert
Burlington , IA

Get your Forms (NOW)!! Call your Internal Revenue Service 1-800-289-1040.

Please pass this on to your friends so they can save on this great offer

"I sent these ideas to the RNC and the McCain campaign. Watch to see if they show up in a debate or ad campaign." -Rachel's Dad

1. Acceptance speach: I have no problem with Joe Biden - Joe Biden is a friend of mine. Senator Obama, You are no Joe Biden.

2.Debate: I have no problem with Joe Biden. Joe Biden should be here debating me you should be debating (McCain's VP choice).

3. Ad: He shut down Interstate 25 in both directions(backed up traffic video would be cool) just so he could accept his coronation.
He may be entitled... to his party's nomination...but is he ready to lead

4. Ad: Obama says: "So let me introduce to you the next president - the next vice president of the US of America, Joe Biden."
John McCain: "Obama is not even sure who should be on top of the ticket is he ready to lead?"

love,

dad


----------------------------------

Fox News has taken a different angle:

HEADLINES FROM THE YEAR: 2029

Hey RWD guy,
"I tried posting to your blog the other day, but nothing happens when I click the "post comment" link. It's a real shame since i was going to comment on the Democratic Convention forward, since it is the easiest forward in the whole world. My mom has only recently seen the light on these emails, but it's almost a shame she did not sent it earlier. The response would have made her think and as we know, thinking is what cures people of this affliction.

Anyway, back to the link. Doesn't seem to be working, however, I am able to post comments to other blogger blogs. Thought you ought to know.
Thanks
-matt"


Thanks Matt. I had no idea why no one was outraged at the latest post. Now I know why. It should be fixed.

Does anyone know why I can't post a graphical header? It says ok and goes through the motions of uploading a header but it never shows up. Sighh.

"My right wing Dad sent this, and I was unsure whether to submit it. It's not funny, only racist and mean-spirited. Sadly, it had a ton of forwards. " -Scott

We hear you Scott. I have suffered that same shock and debate at the sight of "hilarious" forwards like these. Click on the "racism" key word below for more examples. What decade is this, anyway?

-------begin embarrassingly racist forward---------

Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 8:19 PM

Subject: Presidential Plane

* HOW TO START EACH DAY WITH A POSITIVE OUTLOOK:

1. Open a new file in your computer.
2. Name it 'Barack Obama'.
3. Send it to the Recycle Bin.
4. Empty the Recycle Bin.
5. Your PC will ask you: 'Do you really want to get rid of 'Barack Obama?'
6. Firmly Click 'Yes.'
7. Feel better? GOOD - Tomorrow we'll do Nancy Pelosi!*

From: $$$$$$$@%%%%%.net]
Sent: 08/21/2008 02:43 PM MST
Subject: Fwd: ETHICAL DEMOCRATS...THIS IS HILARIOUS!!!! LMAO

Here's "Ann's latest" forward. Um. I don't get the point exactly, but enjoy.
-m

------- begin forward ---------

From: ##########@$$$$$$$.com
Sent: 08/16/2008 05:19 PM MST
Subject: Fwd: Ann's Lates

(click to enlarge) This one is from my dad. It's sort of old now but we all know the timeless comedic value of Hillary to the Right. Right? -m

---------- begin forward -------------

"Yea, like the reich wingers really care about this outside of an opportunity to smear Gore."
-Michael


------- Begin Forward -------

Last year Irena was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize....

She LOST.

Al Gore won, for doing a slide show on Global Warming.

"Here ya go, Mike... more crap from the right wing. Or, in its native language, "Every real American should read this, it will OPEN YOUR EYES!!!" -Mark in San Jose

Thanks Mark. This just beams with the reputable news reporting we expect from email forwards.

Say, have you noticed a recent trend towards more WURDY emails and less animated crucifixes? The forward machine must have kicked into a higher gear. -Mike

----------- Begin Forward --------------

Obama's Not Exactlys: