BREAKING: Top Republican Exposes Hillary Clinton’s Past
November 4, 2017
Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com
The depths of the Clinton’s corruption has been an open secret for years now. Finally, Republicans are beginning to put Hillary on full blast for it.
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), speaking with Breitbart News Daily SiriusXM host Alex Marlow on Thursday, tore into Hillary for her collusion with Russian sources to fund the slanderous Trump dossier.
“Without a Shadow of a Doubt”
During the podcast, DeSantis reminded the public of the inescapable truth about what happened throughout the 2016 elections:
We know now without a shadow of a doubt that the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton paid Fusion GPS and Steele to acquire this dossier, which required colluding with Russian operatives and Russian nationals.
DeSantis went on to share his theory of the particular details surrounding the events:
So, they produced this dossier and I believe, yesterday I called for the FBI, the Justice Department to declassify all the FISA applications involving Trump associates because what I think happened is, I think they used the information from this dossier to be able to get surveillance on Trump and his associates.
“And then the fruits of that,” he continued, “formed the basis of what had been leaked to the press over the first three or four months of Trump’s White House.”
Supporting Narratives
DeSantis’s speculation is hardly far-fetched. Many pundits share similar, if not nearly identical, theories on the situation.
Most notably, political commentator Pat Buchanan wrote an opinion piece that showed the inextricable ties between the many parties in question:
In October 2015, the Washington Free Beacon, a neocon website, engaged a firm of researchers called Fusion GPS to do deep dirt-diving into Trump’s personal and professional life — and take him out.
By May, however, Trump had routed all rivals and was the certain Republican nominee. So the Beacon bailed, and Fusion GPS found two new cash cows to finance its dirt-diving — the DNC and the Clinton campaign.
In June 2016, Fusion GPS engaged a British spy, Christopher Steele, who had headed up the Russia desk at MI6, to ferret out any connections between Trump and Russia.
Steele began contacting old acquaintances in the FSB, the Russian intelligence service. And the Russians began to feed him astonishing dirt on Trump that could, if substantiated, kill his candidacy.
As Buchannan and DeSantis explained, the Clinton campaign went to extreme lengths to try to undermine Trump’s candidacy. Thankfully, these attempts all failed in preventing Trump’s presidency, but they speak to a greater problem; corruption has become a way of life for modern political operatives.
It’s worth taking a moment to comprehend the depth of the scandal. A Democrat candidate funds a slanderous dossier based on information obtained from Russian sources, then helpfully offers this information to the government, (headed by a Democrat president) who then uses this false information to justify spying on a Republican candidate.
Would it be far-fetched to speculate that Obama then shared the information obtained with Hillary’s campaign, thus completing the circle of corruption?
Maybe, but this much is not speculative: Both Obama and Hillary had no qualms about making the American government, funded by taxpayers of all political persuasions and endowed with fearsome law enforcement and surveillance powers, a de facto arm of the Democratic party.
We can only hope that President Trump drains the swamp quickly – otherwise, this corruption will inevitably surface again.
BREAKING: Proof Against Hillary Uncovered – She’s Guilty
November 3, 2017
a katz / Shutterstock.com
The blockbuster information revealed by former Democratic National Committee (DNC) interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile in POLITICOMagazine may bring former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton down. But whether it does or not, one has to ask: how could she have ever lost her bid to become president?
One thing is certain: Brazile’s name has likely been scratched off the Clinton’s Christmas card list this year, after she exposed evidence of Clinton’s underhanded political tactics in the 2016 campaign. Brazile says she found a document detailing how Clinton’s campaign helped bail out the debt-ridden DNC in exchange for control of “the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised.”
Apparently, Clinton was playing to “win at any cost.”
Nomination bought and paid for
Brazile released excerpts of her forthcoming book, which described her experience as the party’s interim chair after Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida left that position amid scandal immediately after the Democratic National Convention.
After Clinton was nominated as the party’s standard-bearer, Brazile promised Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, that she would look into any machinations by the Clintons to rig the primary process. It turned out that they had.
Brazile wrote, “I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.”
She continued:
The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias—specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.
In return for helping the DNC with much of the $24 million debt that then-President Barack Obama had racked up, Clinton was placed on the on-ramp of the freeway to become the Democratic presidential nominee.
“By Sept. 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart,” Brazile recalled.
But her broken heart was short-lived. She later forwarded debate questions to Clinton that she’d obtained while serving as a CNN contributor. It resulted in the loss of her gig with CNN, but gave Clinton a leg up in that network’s debate.
The beat goes on
Clinton’s “win at any cost” game plan didn’t end there. There was also the infamous Fusion GPS dossier that accused her Republican rival for the White House of sexual shenanigans — which were totally unproven.
When the dossier first surfaced, Clinton claimed to have no knowledge of either its existence or how it was financed. Evidence soon began pouring in that proved that both the DNC and the Clinton campaign not only knew about the dossier, but actually paid for it, however, prompting them to change their tune. Now they claim there was nothing wrong with it — they were merely engaged in “opposition research.”
Apparently, the truth to the Clintons is whatever happens to serve their purpose at any given moment. But it may have been too little, too late in this instance.
The Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint late last month with the Federal Election Commission. It accuses both the DNC and Clinton’s campaign of breaking campaign finance law for their failure to disclose the funds they spent for the Fusion GPS dossier.
All this, taken together with all the other campaign dirty tricks the Clintons and the DNC engaged in makes one return to the question asked at the beginning — how could she have lost?
Mark Young, co-host, along with Chuck Woolery, of “Blunt Force Truth,” put it best. He tweeted:
FollowFollow @MarkYoungTruth
More
It must suck to hijack your party, steal a nomination, turn the DNC into money laundromat,bury any evidence against you, finance fake dossier on opponent,swipe the debate questions, and promise free everything, and still lose to someone you call incompetent.
1. The answer is that despite all the tricks, the lies and the coverups, the American people still weren’t deceived when they went to the polls last November 8.
Posts
3 comments:
If she's guilty of all of the things she's being accused of here, why is the current administration not prosecuting her?
Trump, really, REALLY want see her behind bars, yet nothing's happening.
Perhaps that's because she's actually not guilty of anything, leaving nothing for which she can be prosecuted.
(1) When Briebart News is your source, you should just accept the fact that you're willing to believe whatever lies anyone tells you
(2) Someone should remind RWD that Hillary lost the election. This obsession is now verging on pathological.
"Finally, Republicans are beginning to put Hillary on full blast for it (corruption).
LOL
I think republicans are trying to suggest that making a report on one's political opponent is criminal if it involves any details or information from another country. It all sounds so sinister if you just add the words "We know now without a shadow of a doubt" and "dossier,"
All this in an effort to NOT address what was actually in the 'dossier.'
Post a Comment