Fw: FT. HOOD vs Israel

Israelis Baffled by News of Defenseless US Soldiers

Many Israelis want to know: why didn't the soldiers attacked by a U.S. Army major-turned-terrorist return fire?

When a Muslim goes, well, Muslim in
Israel he is typically shot to death by someone--say, a reserve soldier--within seconds of screaming "Allah Akbar."

In contrast with the Israeli experience, it took 10 minutes before a civilian police officer at
Fort Hood was able to shoot and stop Muslim fanatic Nidal Malik Hasan.

How could that happen? How could so many people trained in the strategies and tactics of modern warfare be so defenseless?

The answer--and this may astonish many Americans--is that the victims were unarmed.
U.S. soldiers are not allowed to carry guns for personal protection, even on a 340-acre base quartering more than 50,000 troops.

So it goes in brain-dead, liberal
America.

Fort Hood is a "gun free" zone, thanks to regulations adopted in one of the very first acts signed into law by anti-gun President Bill Clinton in March, 1993. Click here <http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r190_14.pdf> for the file.

Contrary to President Obama's crocodile tears, his administration is bent on further disarming the
U.S. military, and all Americans. Obama and his people will not rest until every American is a sitting duck..





Postscript: Israeli teachers, from kindergarten on up, are also armed; so, a Virginia Tech-type slaughter is highly unlikely at an Israeli university.

Israelis, who have had to combat terrorism all their lives, are not afraid of guns. They are an armed people, ready, willing, and able to defend themselves and their country.

Unlike indoctrinated Americans, paralyzed by fear and political correctness, Israelis understand that people, not guns, kill people.

FW: Den of Thieves

What a den of thieves! Somebody spent a lot of time putting this one together.

Pretty good summary of what is known - how much more is hidden?




$34,000:
The amount of federal taxes that Secretary of the Treasury
Timothy Geithner
(D) failed to pay during his employment at
the International Monetary Fund despite receiving extra
compensation and explanatory brochures that described his
tax liabilities.

True: http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2009/01/timothy_geithner_obamas_nomine.html "



$75,000:
The amount of money that the head of the powerful
tax-writing committee,
Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY), was
forced to report on his taxes after the discovery that he
had not reported income from a Dominican Republic rental
property. His excuses for the failure started with blaming
his wife, then his accountant and finally the fact that he
didn't speak Spanish.

Truehttp://www.nypost.com/seven/09102008/news/regionalnews/rangels_spanish_excuse_128444.htm



$93,000:
The INCREASE in the amount of petty cash each of our
Congressional representatives
voted to give themselves in
January, 2009 during the height of an economic meltdown.
That's a $40 + million INCREASE!

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot....com/2009/01/its-recession-congress-gives-lawmakers.html See video here from Fox


$133,900:
The amount Fannie Mae "invested" in Chris Dodd (D-CT), head
of the powerful Senate Banking Committee, presumably to
repel oversight of the GSE prior to its meltdown. Said
meltdown helped touch off the current economic crisis. In
only a few years time, Fannie also "invested" over
$105,000 in then-Senator Barack Obama.
True:
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/07/top-senate-recipients-of-fanni.html


$140,000:
The amount of back taxes and interest that Cabinet nominee
Tom Daschle (D)
was forced to cough up after the vetting
process revealed significant, unexplained tax liabilities.
True:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123335984751235247.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Wall Street Journal


$356,000:
The approximate amount of income and deductions that
Daschle (D)
was forced to report on his amended 2005 and
2007 tax returns after being caught cheating on his taxes.
This includes $255,256 for the use of a car service,
$83,333 in unreported income, and $14,963 in charitable
contributions.
True:
http://online ..wsj.com/article/SB123335984751235247.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Wall Street Journal


$800,000:
The amount of "sweetheart" mortgages Senate Banking
Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT)
received from Countrywide
Financial, the details for which he has refused to release
details despite months of promises to do so.. Countrywide
was once the nation's largest mortgage lender and linked
to Government-Sponsored Entities like Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. Their meltdown precipitated the current
financial crisis. Just days ago in Pennsylvania , Countrywide
was forced to pay $150,000,000 in mortgage
assistance following "a state investigation that concluded
that Countrywide relaxed its underwriting standards to
sell risky loans to consumers who did not understand them
and could not afford them."
True:
http://rightvoices.com/2008/08/21/more-sweetheart-loan-details-on-senator-chris-dodd-d-ct-chairman-of-the-senate-committee-on-banking-housing-and-urban-affairs/



$1,000,000:
The estimated amount of donations by Denise Rich, wife of
fugitive, Marc Rich, to Democrat interests and the William
J. Clinton Foundation in an apparent quid pro quo deal that
resulted in a pardon for Mr. Rich. The pardon was reviewed
and blessed by Obama Attorney General and then Deputy AG
Eric Holder, despite numerous requests by government
officials to turn it down.
True:
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/nov/20/nation/na-holder20



$12,000,000:
The amount of TARP money provided to community bank
OneUnited despite the fact that it did not qualify for
funds, and was "under attack from its regulators for
allegations of poor lending practices and executive pay
abuses." It turns out that
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), a key
contributor to the Fannie Mae meltdown, just happens to be
married to one of the bank's former directors.
True:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123258284337504295.html Wall Street Journal


$23,500,000:
The upper range of net worth Rep. Allan Mollohan (D-WV)
accumulated in four years time according to The Washington
Post through earmarks of "tens of millions of dollars to
groups associated with his own business partners."
True:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/14/AR2006051401032.html Washington Post



$2,000,000,000:
($2 billion) the approximate amount of money that House
Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-WI) is earmarking
related to his son's lobbying efforts. The son, Craig Obey,
is "a top lobbyist for the nonprofit group" that would receive a roughly $2 billion component of the "Stimulus"package.
True: http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/a_plan_for_stimulus_money_national_parks/C530/L37/
and this as a list of these related stories:
http://search.yahoo.com/404handler?src=news&+++%0A+fr%3D404_news%26ref%3Dhttp://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/01/obama-democrats-by-numbers.html&url=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090129/ap_on_go_co/stimulus_national_parks_2


$3,700,000,000:
(
$3.7 billion) not to be outdone, this is the estimated
value of various defense contracts awarded to a company
controlled by the husband of Rep. Diane Feinstein (D-CA).
Despite an obvious conflict-of-interest as "a member of
the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee, Sen.
Feinstein voted for appropriations worth billions to her
husband's firms."

True: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL



$4,190,000,000:
($4.19 billion) the amount of money in the so-called
"Stimulus" package devoted to
fraudulent voter
registration
ACORN group under the auspices of "Community
Stabilization Activities". ACORN is currently the subject
of a RICO suit in Ohio .
True:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/stimulus-economy-percent-2295331-bill-pelosi




$1,646,000,000,000 ($1.646 trillion):
The approximate amount of annual United States exports
endangered by the "Stimulus" package
, which provides a "Buy
American" stricture. According to international trade
experts, a "US-EU trade war looms" which could result in
a worldwide economic depression reminiscent of that touched
off by the protectionist Smoot-Hawley Act.

True: http://www.asiaing.com/2008-national-export-strategy-the-new-global-main-street.html
and
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/01/022685.php
Background: Smmot-Hawley Act:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot-Hawley_Tariff_Act

It's becoming a culture of corruption and stupidity. In addition, these folks appear to be above the law.


All of the aforementioned are still in office, living like the royalty they think they are.
Remember: This all happened in just theFIRST QUARTER of 2009!

Fw: I NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT IT THIS WAY..... Very enlightening!

----- Original

Subject: I NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT IT THIS WAY..... Very enlightening!





----- Forwarded Message

There are some things I disagree with here (like the importance of pharmaceutical companies and I'm not sure it's the Democratic party that wanted to cap law suits) but there are some other good points......

I NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT IT THIS WAY..... Very enlightening!


This is very interesting! I never thought about it this way. Perhaps this is why so many physicians are conservatives or republicans.

The Democratic Party has become the Lawyers' Party.
Barack Obama is a lawyer.
Michelle Obama is a lawyer.
Hillary Clinton is a lawyer.
Bill Clinton is a lawyer.
John Edwards is a lawyer.
Elizabeth Edwards is a lawyer.
Every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate).
Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.

Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress:
Harry Reid is a lawyer.
Nancy Pelosi is a lawyer.

The Republican Party is different.
President Reagan was an actor and a Union president (actors).
President Bush was a businessman..
Vice President Cheney was a businessman.

The leaders of the Republican Revolution:
Newt Gingrich was a history professor.
Tom Delay was an exterminator.
Dick Armey was an economist.
House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer.
The former Senate Majority Leader Bill First is a heart surgeon.
Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and
who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against Ronald Reagan in 1976..

The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers.
The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.

Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick, like First, or
who immerse themselves in history, like Gingrich.


The Lawyers' Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want in a free enterprise market system, as the enemies of America . And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers' Party, grow.

Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail?
Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.

This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers. Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.
Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation. When politicians as lawyers begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming. Some Americans become "adverse parties" of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.
Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big. When lawyers use criminal prosecution as a continuation of politics by other means, as happened in the lynching of Scooter Libby and Tom Delay, then the power of lawyers in America is too great. When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.
We cannot expect the Lawyers' Party to provide real change, real reform or real hope in America . Most Americans know that a republic in which every major government action must be blessed by nine unelected judges is not what Washington intended in 1789. Most Americans grasp that we cannot fight a war when ACLU lawsuits snap at the heels of our defenders. Most Americans intuit that more lawyers and judges will not restore declining moral values or spark the spirit of enterprise in our economy..
Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.
The United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers! The State of Georgia has more lawyers than the country of Japan . Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as "spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you" and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party. When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association goes to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical
and product costs being so high!


Please -- DO PASS THIS ON!!!

Fw: A Real Christmas Miracle

Subject: A Real Christmas Miracle

This guy really gets it.


From: Dr. Bill (a renowned, retired orthopedic surgeon) Date: 12/29/2009 3:31:30 PM Subject: A Real Christmas Miracle


Nothing like listening and watching the news to get your mind off your own, more immediate troubles. Since this most recent terrorist attack, the news services have been buzzing with new developments and the reactions of the pundits and politicians on this subject.

I refer, of course, to NWA flight 253, from Amsterdam, Netherlands to Detroit, Michigan, where one Umar Farouk Abdulmutollah set off an incendiary device, in an effort to kill everyone on board, over American soil, using specially prepared underware, laced with powdered explosives.

The terrorist is a 23 year old Nigerian man, whose own father, a prominent businessman, warned our embassy that his son was a radicalized Muslim, bent on jihad. Hmmmm...young Muslim man attempts to blow up a plane arriving on U.S. Soil, on Christmas Day (second holiest day of the year for Christians, not the first, as erroneously reported by some—that would be Easter). Nice. Think that might indicate a religious motive,
I.e.., an act of jihad inspired terrorism and a direct affront to Christians? Naaah!

According to our eminent Secretary for Homeland Security, this past Sunday, "the system worked." Really? (Where DOES he get these idiots to serve in his cabinet?) Next day, a 180 degree about face, with words to the effect that the system DIDN'T work, after all. Dammit Janet! (inside joke—Rocky Horror reference)

The TSA response? Now, no one can go to the bathroom for the last hour of the flight (good luck if you're pregnant, diabetic, on diuretics, have prostate enlargement, etc) AND you can't have a paperback book, or blanket on your lap. You just have to be bored for an hour. Then, after the outcry at this stupidity, they modified the policy, so now the captain of the plane can decide.

Idiocy. All of it. This does NOTHING to insure our safety. Where are the trained dogs, to sniff out explosives? Where is the rational profiling of potential terrorists? Are we all to die, for fear of offending our enemies?

This guy should have been on terror watch lists. He paid for a one-way ticket, with cash and no luggage. He lacked a passport, yet was allowed to get on board the plane. WHAT "system?"

Then, the President, after delaying 72 hours, y'know, just to be sure he's got all the info correct, came in off the golf course in Hawaii, long enough to mention the pro forma phrases expected about the "alleged" "suspect."

Alleged? Suspect? Legalistic terms, which reveal Obama's legalistic frame of reference. It is KNOWN that this guy actually detonated his igniter. Luckily, he's not too swift and his bomb assembly in the bathroom of the plane was faulty. Otherwise, we'd have had a real massacre in the air, with nearly 300 dead.

Thanks to a Dutch guy, with some balls, who grabbed this moron, subdued him and said moron's own ineptitude in bomb assembly, he wasn't successful. But he DID set off his device--we were just lucky that it failed to detonate. This was NOT a crime, like holding up a liquor store, or mugging an old lady. This WAS a terrorist attack. Not attempted either--completed, but fortunately unsuccessful.
This was a real Christmas miracle.

This was also an ACT OF WAR by people who hate us and want to KILL US. Somebody clue-in the Commander-in-Chief.

Then he said something that should send chills down your spine: He said that this was "an isolated incident."

Waitaminnit!

We know this guy was radicalized, per his own father. We know he was trained by Al Qaeda in Yemen. Al Quaeda has taken credit for the attack, publicly. "Isolated incident?" Are you friggin' kidding me?

Our President STILL can't bring himself to realize or admit that we're in a WAR with maniacs, religious fanatics, who think that killing innocent civilians is doing Allah's will. (As if an all powerful, omniscient, transcendant Deity, who created all the world and all of us, believers and infidels alike, needs the likes of these unwashed mongrels to do His will. Well, one cannot expect logic from a fundamentally non-rational construct. But I digress...)

Look, I hope I'm wrong, but I think these guys, all of them, in this Administration, are rank amateurs, if not complete fools. And I think they will continue to do incredibly stupid things, and keep their collective head in the sand, until one day, there are 10,000 dead Americans in the streets (or in the air). Then, there'll be hand wringing aplenty. And commentators will ask, in great seriousness, "What went wrong?" and "Were there warning signs?"

I don't expect genius, especially from this crowd. But I do expect common sense. And there seems to be a real dearth of that commodity in Washington, these days.

As more and more details of this case come out, one's incredulity grows apace. But now, with the "suspect" having lawyered up, he cannot now be questioned by the CIA or FBI. His "rights" would be violated. WHAT rights? So now, we can't learn about future planned attacks. That's the legacy of a "criminal" approach.

The terrorist (which is what he is) has reportedly gotten third degree burns from his little stunt, according to his lawyer. Are we supposed to feel bad for this guy? Screw waterboarding. I'm for tying this guy on an ant hill.

AAAARRRGGHH! I can't stand it any more! There are still people out there who support this Administration, despite all this massive incompetence, the spineless supination, despite the clear and present danger they represent for our republic and our safety. What will it take to convince them they were WRONG about this guy and his minions. I wish I were wrong... but I know I'm not.

Ah well, I just had to vent my spleen, one more time, for the end of the old year.

Well, up and at 'em. Talk to you soon, my friend. ’Til next time, be well.

Dr. Bill

Fw: The History we share with Muslims...

Curator's note: This RW FWD: seems to be new version of this one previously entered into the archive


----- Would our president lie?


Subject: The History we share with Muslims...



Another Myth ...

Some Of The History

We Share With Muslims

The Presidential Myth: "Muslims Have Always Been a Part of America's History"

It is pure horse manure that “Muslims have always been a part of America’s history” – their only ‘documented’ role in our early history was the bad fortune of having been the target of the U.S. Marines when President Jefferson sent a task force to Tripoli Libya in 1805 to route the Muslim pirates headquartered there and to free hostage Americans being held there.

President Obama said, in his Cairo speech: "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story.

Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? No. There is no evidence that any Native American Indians were Muslims.

Were there any Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving Day? Nope - again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Is there even one Muslim’s signature on the United States Constitution? Declaration of Independence? Bill of Rights?

Nope, no documentation supports the fact that there were any Muslims in America then.

Were there any Muslims fighting in the Continental Army for this country's freedom from England? Again, no.

How many Muslims were engaged during the fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America? Nada, none, zero, zippo. As a matter of fact, as reported by the Human Rights watchdogs of the globe, Muslims, to this day, are still the largest traffickers in human slavery.

Where were the Muslims during the marching and demonstrating in the Civil Rights era of this country? None there, once again, absent. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights – not even any of Malcolm X’s Black Muslims.

Where were the Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage movement?

Again, none present.

In fact, devout Muslims demand that women be subservient to men in the Islamic culture - so much so that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man that is not a direct family member or their husband.

And does anyone remember the involvement of any Muslims on the side of the Allies during WWII?

Again, they weren’t there – those that were involved at all were aligned with Adolph Hitler. There are historical reports that the Muslim Grand Mufti himself (whoever the hell that was) met with Adolph Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews.

And where exactly were our fine Muslim friends on Sept. 11th, 2001?

That is, if they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or into a field in Pennsylvania, killing more than 3,000 people on our own soil.

Where were they?

Well, if you believe the so-called liberal media reports, they were all busy rejoicing in ghettos in Detroit, San Francisco, and all over the Middle East. It is pretty hard to deny the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world showing them celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other news networks that day.

Strangely, the so-called "moderate" Muslims like those in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Detroit and San Francisco,

were stone cold silent post 9-11.

To many Americans, their silence means approval for the acts of that day.

This is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America?

The President’s made-up history as told in Cairo is simply fiction.

And, here is another interesting fact: "Asalmu alaykum" is not an "Arabic greeting".

These were the words that President Obama uttered to begin his 'speech'.

"Asalmu alaykum" is a required greeting from one Muslim to another Muslim. Muslims and non-Muslims, of whatever ethnic group, do not normally exchange this greeting.

WHAT HAS AMERICA DONE?

 
Creative Commons License
MyRightWingDad.net is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.