MyRightWingDad.net

2 comments:

Mr_Creosote said...

Horse shit. Busted myth, he never said that. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/how-to-create-a-social-state/

Saul Alinsky is a go-to boogeyman thrown around by RW dolts who repeat what the astroturfing RW pundits say. Your average RWD troglodyte knows shit-all about Saul Alinsky and has heard of him only through RW media name dropping.

In turn, this RWF is just an attempt to attach a boogyman's name to use as an instrument from which to spout some Teabagger party muck. It's funny ( though not ha ha funny ) at the amount of projection is in these points.

A dissection:

"1) Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people"

More like, keep healthcare expensive out of reach of those icky working class types and they'll be too impoverished or ill to raise torches and pitchforks.

"2) Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live."

Lame attempt at trying to project on the fly and hope we don't notice. Actually, the right is getting by just fine by NOT providing them to live, and thus making them marginalized via downward pressure on their wages and precariousness of their situation thanks to trickle-down economic bullshit.

"Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty."

"Debt" or "the deficit" being a concern if a republican ISN'T in the white house. Then it's fine to both cut taxes for corporations already sitting on mountains of cash and shovelling more money to the MIC...which wanted for nothing before.

"4) Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state."

RWD is authoritarian to the bone, and we already have a de-facto police state. The police have become more aggressive and militarized, and if RWD thinks he's going to hold off being swatted by the police or military with his 17 round capacity Glock while hiding behind his camo-painted lift-kitted pickup truck, he's dangerously ignorant.

"5) Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)."

You have yourself to blame RWD for allowing business/corporate takeover of policy cuts wages, or unemploys people so that they NEED assistance. Here's another thing RWD: Most people welfare or SNAP programs are rural whites, not "those people" in urban centers. Fact.

"6) Education - Take control of what people read and listen to - take control of what children learn in school."

Riiight! Don't want them learning how to think in terms of nuance or use critical thinking by having their minds poisoned by "librul arts". Better yet, you can homeschool them to learn that 3+3=5 because GAWD says so. Which brings me to:

"7) Religion - Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools"

Pathetic attempt at trying to mainstream theocracy. Separation between church and state is real RWD: Deal with it.

"8) Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor."

The doozy of them all. The RW of both parties has been pissing on the working class and telling them it's rain ever since the corrosive effects of supply-side/trickle-down economics became apparent. You've hollowed out the middle/working class, caused their incomes to stagnate, then have the balls to bleat "class warfare" when it's been YOU that fired the first shot and every one thereafter.

14 June, 2018 12:40  

pickum said...

Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live."

Lame attempt at trying to project on the fly and hope we don't notice. Actually, the right is getting by just fine by NOT providing them to live, and thus making them marginalized via downward pressure on their wages and precariousness of their situation thanks to trickle-down economic bullshit.

---Where do you go to prove that a specific group of people, based on wealth or poverty "are easier to control"?

---When the people of East Germany took down the boarders between them and West Germany, were they wealthier, or poorer, than the Soviet population of 1989?

---the same goes for the Hungarian population in 1989.

---What about the Hungarian population of 1956, versus the Soviet population of 1956, just before the 1956 Hungarian uprising? Were the Soviet citizens wealthier than the Hungarian ones, then in 1956?

15 June, 2018 00:30  

Post a Comment