tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post8609857760087994730..comments2023-11-05T03:05:05.785-05:00Comments on MyRightWingDad.net: Fw: A great NY Times article....right on the money.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-11919118626784572632014-01-03T15:10:56.126-05:002014-01-03T15:10:56.126-05:00Oh, that's an easy one.
If you can paint the ...Oh, that's an easy one.<br /><br />If you can paint the now right-of-center (but still moderate in ideology) New York Times as the leading liberal publication, then you've moved the Overton Window to the extreme right by another couple of clicks.<br /><br />It's why a moderate-rightwing Democrat like Obama is the worst socialist in history. The think-tanks know it's not true, gruaudnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-44398689006830709942014-01-03T13:43:41.563-05:002014-01-03T13:43:41.563-05:00I wonder why the Hoover Institute felt the need to...I wonder why the Hoover Institute felt the need to lie about this drivel being published in the NYT? It's like conservative think tanks lie for no reason at all, or just because they know that they can get away with it. <br /><br />Why not admit where this was published? The conservatives who read this won't get any more riled up by thinking it was published in the NYT... or does Hooray4USnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-65321702978307169662014-01-03T11:32:51.986-05:002014-01-03T11:32:51.986-05:00Number 1: a LIE about where this "typing"...Number 1: a LIE about where this "typing" was published - check<br /><br />Number 2: calling the NYT "America's leading liberal publication" when the NYT is not liberal at all anymore (if it ever was) - check<br /><br />Number 3: "typing" done by highly compensated rightwing gravy train recipient from a rightwing think tank - check<br /><br />Number 4: WSJ, ferschitznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-36894200719838397802014-01-03T09:17:29.559-05:002014-01-03T09:17:29.559-05:00This person is a paid intellectual?
No evidenc...This person is a paid intellectual? <br /><br />No evidence of anything is provided here, just a bunch of hurt feelings. At least most right wing forwards take the effort to make up some bullshit fact or quote to be mad about. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-88066927236126928402014-01-03T06:57:55.731-05:002014-01-03T06:57:55.731-05:00Again, no.
Ajami writes for the Wall Street Journ...Again, no.<br /><br />Ajami writes for the Wall Street Journal, whose editorial section is, and I'm being polite here, batshit extremist. This never apperared in the NYT (not that the NYT editorial page is free of ass-hattery -- after all, they saw fit to give Brooks, Friedman, Douthat, and Dowd jobs and they are all pretty terrible).<br /><br />So right off the bat, these assertions are gruaudnoreply@blogger.com