tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post3711810680244512579..comments2023-11-05T03:05:05.785-05:00Comments on MyRightWingDad.net: Fwd: FW: Fw: The perfect analogyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-62540987870699924322014-01-22T18:21:41.724-05:002014-01-22T18:21:41.724-05:00"Or was that another rightwing commenter?&quo..."Or was that another rightwing commenter?"<br /><br />Don't care. They're either trolling, distracting, playing both sides do it, or some other disingenuous, hypocritical bullshit. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />gruaudnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-89429351692015120092014-01-22T13:46:58.441-05:002014-01-22T13:46:58.441-05:00I don't feel like reading through those commen...I don't feel like reading through those comments again, but I thought the Anon Ayn Randian teh poorz hater called you out for being "elitist" for using the $5million dollar word, "facile." Or was that another rightwing commenter?<br /><br />Anyhoo, I doubt that commenter would sully him/herself by reading the likes of the allegedly & scornfully <i>liberal</i> NYT (ferschitznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-27275199478112906302014-01-22T13:02:57.123-05:002014-01-22T13:02:57.123-05:00I think our anonymous minimum-wage hater probably ...I think our anonymous minimum-wage hater probably read that ridiculous David Fucking Brooks essay in NYT:<br /><br />http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/17/opinion/brooks-the-inequality-problem.html?hp&rref=opinion&_r=0<br /><br />Naturally, DFB got his shit lit up by the rest of the world.<br /><br />http://driftglass.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-no-homers-club.html<br /><br />Millionaires waxinggruaudnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-70575264805238183822014-01-22T12:00:12.265-05:002014-01-22T12:00:12.265-05:00hmmmm.... well I have to tip my hat to the rightw...hmmmm.... well I have to tip my hat to the rightwing think tank that "created" this RWF. OTOH, it's quite hilarious that the shill who typed this used a quote that was written as a negative description of <i>creationists... being that many who read & pass on these RWFs are likely to be creationists, themselves.</i><br /><br />Almost like that rightwing think tank hack is ferschitznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-47452011629862950432014-01-22T11:50:59.796-05:002014-01-22T11:50:59.796-05:00"Problem with debating creationists, March 16..."Problem with debating creationists, March 16, 2005 <br />By S. D. WeitzenhofferThis review is from: Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction (Hardcover) <br />Debating creationists on the topic of evolution is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon -- it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.<br /><br />The pro-creationist ferschitznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3921098406878065065.post-19437579170125335532014-01-22T08:02:37.025-05:002014-01-22T08:02:37.025-05:00Putin never said this, of course. That doesn'...Putin never said this, of course. That doesn't mean that the conservatives won't clutch this to their breasts with happiness, because it fits in with their narrative of imaginary Obama.<br /><br />The quote was made by Scott D. Weitzenhoffer on Amazon in 2005, regarding trying to debate with Creationists.gruaudnoreply@blogger.com